Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 00:05, Kim Oldfield via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > I haven't see a response to my question of when to use multiple lanes or > separate ways. In this intersection there are small plastic obstructions > between lanes. I can see arguments for modelling the

Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

Hi Andrew, A couple of days ago I updated this intersection to remove a couple of short ways, merge some ways, and update the turn restrictions. There should now be only one ways to negotiate the intersection from any entry to exit. This may explain why online directions are working, while Os

Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

On 21/9/21 6:54 pm, Andrew Davidson wrote: guidance. This is just a standard roundabout except for the fact that you need to be in the left lane to turn left on some of the arms. OK, brain not working. I mean you need to be in the right lane to go straight through. __

Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

On 18/9/21 9:04 pm, Kim Oldfield via Talk-au wrote: Andrew, are you familiar with this intersection from travelling through it? No, and it may be some time before I could visit in person :-( I came across this one because it had a broken turn restriction. Based on what had been mapped I ass

Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

Hi, When should separate ways be drawn, and when should lane tags be used on a single way? In this intersection the asphalt is continuous between parallel lanes, but they are separated by long rubber strips with a cross section about 20cm wide and 10cm high - not something a router should exp

Re: [talk-au] Another Melbourne intersection for review

>From a quick look at aerial imagery I think it's pretty much accurate. I don't >see all that mich that could be improved, though perhaps removing parallel >ways in some spots. Get Outlook for Android From: Andrew Davidson Sent: Saturday,