--- On Mon, 15/6/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
I definitely agree external data sources
should be reviewed some how before being imported such that
anything currently in place remains as the authoritative
instance.
I didn't mean to suggested that any govt provided data
--- On Mon, 15/6/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Yep
have the email history and a copy is on its way to you
directly.
Thanks for that, it's exactly what I was looking for, not planning to use it
word for word, but it's given me a nice template to start from.
--- On Sun, 14/6/09, Paul Zagoridis pa...@zagz.com wrote:
Pick up the phone and talk to your
local member AND the electoral staff.
I know from previous correspondence on issues they always tell me to put it in
a letter and send it to the member, luckily they also accept emails these days.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Delta Foxtrot wrote:
I'm just wondering, nothing came up on google when searching, if there is
any example letters floating about petitioning MPs for access to federal
data and making it public domain.
The reason I ask is the electorate, both state and federal, I'm in is
Lets just think about the end goals of getting MPs involved: adding more data
to the map.
Now basically there seems to be 2 threads of argument about how best to do
this: 1) Through mass import of external datasets and 2) through contributions
by users.
Method 1) is often required for things
And the problem with importing things like roads from government databases is
that they are the gazetted road position not the actual on ground road
position. That's why google maps etc are so often incorrect.
Thats why some of the ABS data does not line up with the actual plotted road.
6 matches
Mail list logo