On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 16:34, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
> But while useful, the question is really whether a full stream import is
> worthwhile.
>
I would say yes (if it's not too much effort required to do so?)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 26/05/2023 2:10 pm, Kim Oldfield via Talk-au wrote:
> I also find streams useful to indicate the surrounding ground is
> downhill towards them. Being at the bottom of a valley it is also
> fairly obvious when you encounter one in person.
>
> They are often hard to map from aerial imagery as
On 26/5/23 14:51, Tom Brennan wrote:
DCS Base and Topo don't distinguish between perennial and non-perennial
That information is available in the NSW Water Theme data eg:
https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/item.html?id=7b0e959effd749c788d304a4179abf8a
That data is licensed
On 27/5/23 16:48, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 16:34, Tom Brennan wrote:
But while useful, the question is really whether a full stream
import is
worthwhile.
I would say yes (if it's not too much effort required to do so?)
Thanks
Graeme
I too would
On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 08:42, Tom Brennan wrote:
> what's the reason for using relations? Or
> is it specifically for the search that you mentioned?
A relation can also be linked 1:1 with an item for the waterway in
Wikidata, and with the wider web of linked data.
--
Andy Mabbett
I hadn't seen that page until Andrew Davidson mentioned it earlier in
the thread.
But the NSW Water Theme data falls under the DCS Foundational Spatial
Data, which is listed as having a waiver, and thus usable...
[And I probably should have been more specific with the wording - I knew
that
My main area of interest from a stream point of view is the Hawkesbury
Catchment, outside the Sydney suburban boundaries.
I haven't been involved in any imports so you'll have to excuse my
ignorance.
Could the dataset be split into say urban/non-urban and the non-urban
parts imported? Or do
7 matches
Mail list logo
