On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:20 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So I would agree with this proposal, although I'd like to see an OSM
file before hand of the changes...
An OSM file like the osmChange ... ones (eg.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/0123/download), or the
On 10 October 2010 16:57, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
An OSM file like the osmChange ... ones (eg.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/0123/download), or the
osm ... one that JOSM can save new edits as when you go FileSave As?
As JOSM spits out, that way the
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 October 2010 16:57, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
An OSM file like the osmChange ... ones (eg.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/0123/download), or the
osm ... one that JOSM can save
On 10 October 2010 17:25, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you tell the changes from the things that haven't changed when
viewing this in JOSM though?
You load a new layer from the DB and can compare the 2...
___
Talk-au mailing
Had a look, a few errors spotted.
1) Weeney Bay and Quibury Bay are joined together as a way. Need to
separarate them as separate ways. Easiest way is to create 2 filters on each
way. IE Weeney Bay and Quibury Bay. Then you can turn each way off and on to
fix.
2) Botany Bay is still set as
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:20 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Me personally I like the maritime law description, where the coast
line cuts across bays and the mouths of rivers etc...
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
4) Add extra way for
1) Yes the natural= oastline needs to go across the bay entrance if you are
turning it into a bay or river, etc.
2) Have a look at the relation within the relation editor and you should see
that the two bays join as one way and not as two separate polygons.
3)I think it prob isn't part of Botany
Looks like someone has made a recent error anyway with Botany bay. They have
created a closed bay and marked it as coastline. It should be marked as
natural=bay or natural=water with the coastline across the entrance of the
bay.
Markus_g
___
Talk-au
I've made the revisions,
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~amha119/botany-bay-relation2.osm
So I've used the multipolygon to make islands as inner, and left the
other bays are separate bays. After I get this working I can then try
to turn Congwong Bay at the East into an area, and then it can be
Almost.
1) Bare Island isn't a closed way. But that can be easily fixed.
2) Remove the tags from the outer way of Botany Bay and label the
multipolygon with name=Botany Bay natural=bay attribution=ABS
Regards,
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org
Okay, I've just moved the bay tags to multipolygon, and added that
small way that closes Bare Island to the multipolygon. I've left the
ABS tags on the outer way, because that is what they are attributing,
the location of the nodes on that way. The fact that the outer way
forms Botany Bay I know
Looks good.
Good call on the ABS tags as one of the inner islands isn't ABS.
Regards,
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey
Sent: Monday, 11 October 2010 9:00 AM
To: OSM Australian Talk
Hi everyone,
Only 1 week to go until the next mapping meetup. Please let me know if
you plan on attending.
- David
On 4 October 2010 20:49, David Dean dd...@ieee.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Brisbane OSM propaganda follows. Please let me know if you don't want
to receive these emails in future.
13 matches
Mail list logo
