On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:27 AM wrote:
> This looks to me to be unqualified permission. There is no mention of
> CC-BY-SA and I would expect that their permission to continue till
> they revoked it.
>
> The licence change over was opt-in not opt-out.
Hi
Their statement is:
"Yes, the Commission agrees to your using our information to provide
data (for Openstreetmap, others)"
This looks to me to be unqualified permission. There is no mention of
CC-BY-SA and I would expect that their permission to continue till
they revoked it.
Tony
On 26/4/20 11:28 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I asked on the talk-gb list and this was discussed before, they did get
a response from CWGC in 2010:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-April/024456.html
contains this link:
On 26/04/2020 14:52, Simon Poole wrote:
... I would suggest at least giving a heads up on a
suitable country specific medium before proceeding, doing otherwise is
just going to lead to strife.
It's an import, so the guidelines linked from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import would
At the danger of pointing out the glaringly obvious: assuming that
licence etc gets sorted out, the data is not being added in Australia,
but in other countries. If the number of imported elements is above a
handful in a country I would suggest at least giving a heads up on a
suitable country
On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote:
> On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of
>>> battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well
>>> as an
6 matches
Mail list logo
