Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:27 AM wrote: > This looks to me to be unqualified permission. There is no mention of > CC-BY-SA and I would expect that their permission to continue till > they revoked it. > > The licence change over was opt-in not opt-out.

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

Hi Their statement is: "Yes, the Commission agrees to your using our information to provide data (for Openstreetmap, others)" This looks to me to be unqualified permission. There is no mention of CC-BY-SA and I would expect that their permission to continue till they revoked it. Tony

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 26/4/20 11:28 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: I asked on the talk-gb list and this was discussed before, they did get a response from CWGC in 2010: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-April/024456.html contains this link:

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 26/04/2020 14:52, Simon Poole wrote: ... I would suggest at least giving a heads up on a suitable country specific medium before proceeding, doing otherwise is just going to lead to strife. It's an import, so the guidelines linked from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import would

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

At the danger of pointing out the glaringly obvious: assuming that licence etc gets sorted out, the data is not being added in Australia, but in other countries. If the number of imported elements is above a handful in a country I would suggest at least giving a heads up on a suitable country

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: > On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of >>> battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well >>> as an

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 22/04/2020 00:15, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 21/04/2020 23:57, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: >>> On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > As both a (very amateur) military historian

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 23:57, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: >> On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 13:50, Warin wrote: > On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of >>> battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well >>> as an

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/4/20 7:57 pm, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 09:53, Greg Lauer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of > battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well > as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying to do. But... > > The terms and

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

Hi Daniel, As both a (very amateur) military historian who has visited many of battlefields/CWG's through the Asia Pacific, Africa and Europe, as well as an Open Data proponent, I really like what you are trying to do. But... The terms and conditions of OSM in relation to data imports is fairly

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 21/04/2020 02:25, Warin wrote: > On 20/4/20 9:10 am, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 20/04/2020 00:49, Andrew Davidson wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock >> > wrote: >>> >>> The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 20/4/20 9:10 am, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 20/04/2020 00:49, Andrew Davidson wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote: The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of their cemetery data. The copyright notice

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 20/04/2020 01:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Thanks for your enthusiasm Daniel, but a couple of issues, sorry. > > Anything out of the AWM is covered by CC-BY-NC-3.0 copyright, so we > would need permission to use it. > > https://www.awm.gov.au/about/organisation/corporate/copyright From

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

Thanks for your enthusiasm Daniel, but a couple of issues, sorry. Anything out of the AWM is covered by CC-BY-NC-3.0 copyright, so we would need permission to use it. https://www.awm.gov.au/about/organisation/corporate/copyright &, have you asked for permission to use the word Anzac?

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 20/04/2020 00:49, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock > wrote: > > The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of > their cemetery data. > > > The copyright notice explicitly says you can only

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: > The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of > their cemetery data. > The copyright notice explicitly says you can only use it for personal use. > For the other data sources, I suggest it may not be case of

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

On 19/04/2020 23:41, Andrew Davidson wrote: > I would suggest that you have a read through this: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import > The CWGC copyright notice appears to be compatible with a bulk import of their cemetery data. For the other data sources, I suggest it may not be

Re: [talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

I would suggest that you have a read through this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Anzacathon and mapping possibilities

Hi all, I've put together an Anzacathon online event and mapping is a big part of it https://anzacathon.com/ https://danielpocock.com/anzacathon-national-hackathon-saving-anzac-day/ Some of the things that I've done already: - adding Anzac monuments (e.g. plane crash locations) into