On 6/11/21 20:30, Simon Poole wrote:
Yes, Gruyère is a cheese, it's named after the town of Gruyères see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruy%C3%A8res, very nice place BTW. That's
why I was wondering :-), but I suppose the dairy industry explains it.
I think Wikipedia is wrong on this one.
Am 06.11.2021 um 10:22 schrieb fors...@ozonline.com.au:
Quoting Simon Poole :
PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name.
Good question.
The town is named for a variety of cheese, as the area's history is in
the dairy industry. Cahillton Post Office first opened on 20 August
1892. It was
Quoting Simon Poole :
PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name.
Good question.
The town is named for a variety of cheese, as the area's history is in
the dairy industry. Cahillton Post Office first opened on 20 August
1892. It was renamed Gruyere in 1950 and closed in 1960
Wikipedia
Tony
This is a somewhat unsolved issue in OSM modelling, as both area
(extent) and node (assuming it is not simply the centroid of the area)
convey geometric information that the other cannot. IMHO best would be
to have a similar concept as we do for administrative areas that works
for "places" in
On 5/11/21 18:06, cleary wrote:
Sorry. I should have written ...add the place node to the relation and its role
would be "label".
Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2428804
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sorry. I should have written ...add the place node to the relation and
its role would be "label".
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021, at 5:53 PM, cleary wrote:
> Ideally suburbs would have a relation for the boundary PLUS a node for
> the "label node" as part of the relation. I'm not so familiar
Ideally suburbs would have a relation for the boundary PLUS a node for the
"label node" as part of the relation. I'm not so familiar with Victorian
locations, but this example for South Albury in NSW is an example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5901488
Where there is a boundary and
Hi Dian,
I have an interested in mapping what I call, for want of better
terminology, fuzzy names or sense-of-place and comment in that specific
regard.
In summary: if the suburb has a defined boundary, use an area, if it
doesn't use a node. I would certainly NOT however use both to
Hey all,
I would appreciate the thoughts of the community with regards to suburb
representations.
In a recent change set
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113355648) a node was
introduced for Gruyere. Gruyere is on the urban boundary, but is
technically in Metropolitan Melbourne. As
9 matches
Mail list logo
