Steve Chilton wrote:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
waterway=canal;lock=yes
and
single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not
mapped)
These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the latter on
the UK canal system.)
I
I have edited big relations in JOSM v2561 without any problems
at all.
These include long distance cycle routes that I certainly
haven't
downloaded the whole area for - it would be much too big to
download
from the API. You are right to be cautious, but I don't think
there is a
problem
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Steve Chilton wrote:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
waterway=canal;lock=yes
and
single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not
mapped)
These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the
Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com writes:
Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
One thing that might be useful for this in the UK is my recently
updated web page:
http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/osm-boundaries/
I'm going to find this useful, thanks.
One thing I think might improve it is to put the
Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com writes:
Can't seem to find Birmingham in your drop down list of bondaries!
The list of boundaries is all of the ones that I could find in the OSM
planet dump for the UK. There is a relation called City of
Birmingham, I don't know if this is the one that
On Sun, February 28, 2010 12:32, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Steve Chilton wrote:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
waterway=canal;lock=yes
and
single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not
mapped)
These are definitely sensible. (I have a
moving thread to talk-us where it belongs
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mike N nice...@att.net
Date: 28 February 2010 9:17:01 PST
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Help! Changeset reverted without explanation
I don't see that the Wiki is self-contradictory in this
yes, but the wiki isn't free of errors and can't be used as absolute
reference. Who wrote it? was it based on wide agreement? If it's in wide use for a long period of time with no objections, it is closer to a standard than any other convention. don't
tag forthe renderer! That's ok, as
On 28 Feb 2010, at 11:50 , Mike N wrote:
yes, but the wiki isn't free of errors and can't be used as absolute
reference. Who wrote it? was it based on wide agreement?
If it's in wide use for a long period of time with no objections, it is
closer to a standard than any other
relation is where it belongs too. otherwise we end up again with multiple values on a highway segment. and as soon it's implemented in any renderer it can be used for custom shields or standard highway labels instead the way ref. But the current recommendation on the wiki is BS and can't be
The election has ended and here are the results are in.
Congratulations to Kate Chapman, Serge Wroclawski, Thea Clay, Richard
Welty and Steven Johnson.
Details:
There were 31 potential voters and of that, 23 voted[1]. Each member
could vote for up to 5 nominees.
Here are the final tallies, in
Yo podria confirmar la oficina, pero hasta ahora aun no se en q estado se
encuentra... estamos en contacto.
Slds,
--
sent from my HTC G1, please excuse typos and brevity
On Feb 28, 2010 10:08 PM, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
A partir del terremoto de ayer se han
Dear all,
after the v5 import into OSM we are now down to 26 cases of potential
duplicate entries for health facilities. These cases have been
identified by OSM mappers because two or more facilities are located
close to each other and because they have similar names.
If you want to check and
201 - 213 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
