I think this is (very) good idea.
2011/6/11 Gerard Vanderveken
> **
> I think it is a good idea to name the unnamed paths and tracks to its
> Voetweg and Buurtweg name from the Atlas if these roads exists there.
> Many muncipalities are rediscovering, revaluating and inventarising these
> old an
I think it is a good idea to name the unnamed paths and tracks to its
Voetweg and Buurtweg name from the Atlas if these roads exists there.
Many muncipalities are rediscovering, revaluating and inventarising
these old and sometimes almost forgotten and often neglected roads.
Many times these unna
If it is on the street sign, I agree to put it in the name tag.
Here, they get new names in most communities. My personal favourite is
"Kakhoekweg". Yes, it exists right here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.98051&lon=3.85697&zoom=17&layers=M
There is a sign with that name. The sign on the sou
Where "trage wegen" are being reinstated they are 'named' as Voetweg xx or
Buurtweg yy. Usually there is a name tag on both sides with the same number.
Occasionally there is an arrow with the name of the street the path leads
to. It doesn't hurt to use Voetweg xx or Buurtweg yy as the name when it
> The convention I see for mapping buurt- and voetwegen is as follows:
> name=Voetweg xx
> or
> name=Buurtweg yy
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.88679&lon=4.58564&zoom=16&layers=M
In fact, using the name tag is mainly a bad idea because in the Atlas
der Buurtwegen/Atlas des Chemins Vicinaux
Congratulations for the job. A small article is posted about OSM
covering on the wordpress of LoLiGrUB (http://www.loligrub.be), a LUG
near Mons. The news is re-used by http://www.interlug.be
Hope this will incite new contributors !
linusable
Le 01/06/11 09:22, eMerzh a écrit :
Hi everybody
