Re: [OSM-talk-be] Possible problem with Urbis data import in Brussels

2013-08-22 Thread Glenn Plas
On 2013-08-19 22:25, Jo wrote: Okay, then I looked at the wrong page, apparently. It all started as a series of 'mechanical' operations on the data, but before submitting some human intelligence still needs to be applied to make it all fit with the existing data. We can, of course, create an

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Possible problem with Urbis data import in Brussels

2013-08-22 Thread Jo
Hi Glenn, I've seen all this happening before as I'm monitoring talk-fr and it's indeed quite discouraging to see that people like pnorman with a bit more power to wield than the rest if us, seem to deem it necessary to threaten to block hard working contributors. And I've already been sending him

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Possible problem with Urbis data import in Brussels

2013-08-22 Thread Ben Abelshausen
Hi, I must admit I had to search for a while but these are some of the main reasons for a separate account: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft/Edit_Policy/dedicated_user_account_for_imports Also when having separate accounts imported data can be more easily identified and attribution can b

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Possible problem with Urbis data import in Brussels

2013-08-22 Thread eMerzh
Hi everyone, As i'm a bit surprise that the warning raise only now after more than 2month of integration, I feel that the DWG is legit to raise concerns about any unadvertized ongoing imports. Now, as the urbis "import" look more like a manual process than a bulk and blind edit and that the effect