On 26-01-16 04:27, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
My pleasure. Thanks for discussing and questioning this, this is good.
>
> I seems like I always stumble upon cases like this (also with De Lijn,
> house numbers, Dutch import). So no surprise that I am critical about
> "imports" (
On 26-01-16 05:33, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Glenn Plas wrote:
>> Also, make sure when you create your better OSM bulding, tag it
>> source:geometry=AGIV (I think to recognise agiv sats).
>
> What do I have to do with source:geometry:date in those cases ?
Don't use thi
Johan,
I understand the « mapping party for homeless people » will take place in
Brussels at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, on Saturday, February 27.
Could you or someone else from the team explain a bit more about what
exactly is the plan? From what I understood, the plan is to put a lot of
e
This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/50.61152/6.05211 is
mapped kissing gate.
It’s nota tourniquet, but a very small kissing gate (size of a half
tourniquet), I couldn't pass it with backpack on.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Matthieu Gaillet
wrote:
>
> Wow ! J’aurais dû aller v
On Sunday 24 January 2016 22:38:06 Sander Deryckere wrote:
> I think we should get away from those rcn, lcn and ncn networks. And be
> freer in the allowed networks.
>
> Even now there are problems with rcn networks used for cycle nodes, as
> those are getting introduced in France and Germany, whi
