Je reviens sur le message de Jo et sur la situation avec l'import UrbIS.
Nous avons différentes situations :
1. contour (way) avec une adresse unique (c'est à dire un numéro) :
l'adresse est sur le contour (way)
2. contour (way) avec plusieurs adresses dans l'import : plusieurs nodes
2013/10/21 Pierre Parmentier pierrecparment...@gmail.com
Proposed Features/Multiple
addresseshttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses
I don't like this proposal too much. This is a relation in disguise. So why
not use a real relation instead ? A building
And I'm not the only one: see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses
none of the comments was in favor of this proposal.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/21 Pierre Parmentier pierrecparment...@gmail.com
We should stick to the current well known scheme, thinking about this
renderer issue... it makes no sense to manoevre around a faulty
renderer, being it nominatim or a tileserver. If a search for a street
+ housenumber, city returns nothing, but a search for that same street,
city without
