Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width

2014-03-13 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-03-11 20:23, Ben Laenen wrote : > On Tuesday 11 March 2014 02:21:28 André Pirard wrote: > > NGI rules: > > N#, N##, R#, R##: primary > N###: secondary Not exactly. on the TOP10R map I've shown, N633 (Ourthe), N678, N30 (Beaaufays-Aywaille), N3 (Liege-Germany) are all in red, that's "nationa

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width

2014-03-11 Thread Ben Laenen
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 02:21:28 André Pirard wrote: > Thanks for drawing my attention to that table ;-) > So, I think that the IGN/NGI classifications are more or less the same. > They're based on kind of traffic (main/link/local), > > [...] > > OSM-be can raise dispute for Nxx or for special cas

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width

2014-03-11 Thread Glenn Plas
Replying to Glenn below, pretty colors on the map are pretty but I think there is more important. The most important in my eyes is the number one OSM application: OSM GPS routing. Not sure what you are cracking down (or not ), perhaps you missed the bit where I said I was in sinner mode (=

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width

2014-03-10 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-03-10 18:14, Glenn Plas wrote : > On 10-03-14 18:03, Ben Laenen wrote: >> On Monday 10 March 2014 17:48:06 André Pirard wrote: >>> According to IGN/NGI and the reasoning below, Benedestraat N211a is >>> (officially) a secondary road. >>> >>> The first question is; what is a "primary/seconda

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width

2014-03-10 Thread Glenn Plas
On 10-03-14 18:03, Ben Laenen wrote: On Monday 10 March 2014 17:48:06 André Pirard wrote: According to IGN/NGI and the reasoning below, Benedestraat N211a is (officially) a secondary road. The first question is; what is a "primary/secondary/tertiary road?". And why is it useful to know? To make

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width (was: Humbeeksesteenweg tertiary or secondary road ?)

2014-03-10 Thread Ben Laenen
On Monday 10 March 2014 17:48:06 André Pirard wrote: > According to IGN/NGI and the reasoning below, Benedestraat N211a is > (officially) a secondary road. > > The first question is; what is a "primary/secondary/tertiary road?". > And why is it useful to know? To make better GPS routing? The curr

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Road status & width (was: Humbeeksesteenweg tertiary or secondary road ?)

2014-03-10 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-03-10 13:37, Marc Gemis wrote : > The Humbeeksesteenweg (N211a) was tagged as a tertiary road. > Recently OsmAnd_pieter changed this to secondary. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144119601/history > > Is this correct ? > According to IGN/NGI and the reasoning below, Benedestraat N211a