Re: [OSM-talk-be] railways and stations

2018-01-28 Thread Pieter Vander Vennet
ic trains. > Other comments always welcome. > > StijnRR > > > -- > *From:* Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com> > *To:* talk-be@openstreetmap.org; Stijn Rombauts <stijnromba...@yahoo.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 6:59 PM >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] railways and stations

2018-01-20 Thread Ben Laenen
Your message was directly sent to my spam box for some reason... On Saturday, 20 January 2018 14:27:39 CET Stijn Rombauts wrote: > Hi, > > I am rewriting the conventions page about railways [1]. It was a bit > outdated...A few questions:- I kept the convention about the name ("L" > followed by

Re: [OSM-talk-be] railways and stations

2018-01-20 Thread Jakka
-< "Some switches/junctions have a name (e.g. Y Val-Benoit) and are tagged as railway=junction. But this page [2] seems to suggest that railway=switch is a better tag. Or do we keep the railway=junction tag for named switches/junctions?"> In real life a name like "Y val-Benoit" junction

[OSM-talk-be] railways and stations

2018-01-20 Thread Stijn Rombauts
Hi, I am rewriting the conventions page about railways [1]. It was a bit outdated...A few questions:- I kept the convention about the name ("L" followed by the number of the line, e.g. L25). But I noticed it hasn't been followed in many places (often 25 or L.25). Do we keep this convention or