Whatever makes you happy ;-).
I prefer to tag such building as a building = church, including the tower.
I may have encountered one exception so far where the church tower was not
part of the church building. But those are rare...
My 2 cents..
Gilbert
On 18 September 2013 12:38, Glenn Plas
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Gilbert Hersschens
gherssch...@gmail.comwrote:
I prefer to tag such building as a building = church, including the tower.
I may have encountered one exception so far where the church tower was not
part of the church building. But those are rare...
The same
On 2013-09-18 05:59, Marc Gemis wrote:
In the North of the province of Antwerp (north of Hoogstraten), you'll
find a lot of buildings that were imported by 3d shapes. Almost none
of them seems to match with the AGIV photos. The buildings are to
small, to big, rotated, have the wrong shape,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 2013-09-18 05:59, Marc Gemis wrote:
In the North of the province of Antwerp (north of Hoogstraten), you'll
find a lot of buildings that were imported by 3d shapes. Almost none of
them seems to match with the AGIV
I must have missed the as part of a bigger building. before. I
thought it was only used on stand alone constructions. I did not move
the node yet. It is still at the position of the import.
I'll move it and add the bell_tower tower type.
I share your sentiment, when I think of
