I like getting overhead power lines and underground pipelines when I can
spot them on aerial photos, along with substations, pumping stations and so
on.
Also, swimming pools and tennis courts tend to stand out (on aerials,
again), so I map those when I see them.
__John
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at
It's interesting to compare their approach with that of the capital of what
used to be one of the most closed countries: the Municipality of Tirana
(Albania) is now putting (some of) its data online voluntarily, in
co-operation with the local hackerspace.
http://opendata.tirana.al/
They haven't
North Lane in Bath (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2955824#map=19/51.37754/-2.33364) is very
steep, but only side entrances to houses open onto it, so I'm not sure
whether it counts fully as residential.
__John
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Dave F wrote:
>
>
To me, the current version certainly seems like a step back; I
presumed either it was done to meet some other requirements, or I had
just stupidly missed finding how to do what I wanted, so I didn't say
anything at the time. In particular, ISTR it being much easier on the
previous version to go
Announced in typical Register style:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/13/creepy_satellites_will_be_able_to_zoom_in_on_your_face/
I expect it'll be some time before images become available for OSM, though :-(
And I'm not confusing resolution and accuracy!
__John
I wonder whether these incorrect speed limit notes might not be
reporting that the speed limit on the map isn't what it is on the
road, but someone objecting to what the speed limit on the road is,
and making a token protest about it?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:24 PM, JB jb...@mailoo.org wrote:
I hadn't known (or remembered) that recommendation from the wiki; but
still, the Ukrainian spelling (resulting in a Ukrainian reader
understanding it as a reasonable phonetic imitation of the English
name) may often be very far from a transliteration (letter-for-letting
substitution) from the
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:20 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
I tag them landuse=residential residential=halting_site. This follows
the frequent key=value value=subvalue scheme, account for the fact
that a halting site *is* a residential area of some kind, and doesn't
break
No mention of OSM that I can see, though; a different kind of mapping:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-23203500
http://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/hillforts-atlas.html
__John
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
and this:
http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye )
I like these (although the first one
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Christian Quest
cqu...@openstreetmap.fr wrote:
You can see what zoom level 19 looks like with Mapnik/cartocss style on
http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19lat=48.87206lon=2.30069layers=B
That looks excellent; I'm sure this would be
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
My friend Terence Eden has some interesting comments on documenting
the pronunciation of place names, in this blog post:
Can we solve the problem of how to do this, in OSM?
We could have a keyword convention for
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that in the current render of Bremen there are quite a few
buildings missing, especially some with tags like building=yes or
building=terrace. Is this an error in the import or stylesheets?
I don't
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 10/12/2012 08:18, Kevin Peat wrote:
On Dec 10, 2012 1:25 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote
No. We should be mapping physical objects...
There are plenty of non-physical objects mapped in OSM
As primary
In the view around
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.21134lon=-10.35719zoom=16layers=M,
the road R549 seems to cross the coastline a few times. I brought up
Potlatch 2 to try to fix this. It turned out that the photo data
isn't available for part of that area, but I did notice that the
How long does it take to check a map of China for accuracy? ;-)
With the speed Chinese building companies can work at, I reckon at
least one new city could be built in the time it takes to check the
whole map.
The check really seems to be that various points of contention are to
be shown in the
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea if it means that OSM users need to
register another account to participate in help.osm.org.
+1
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the high viz jackets on sale anywhere?
You used to be able to get them shipped internationally from
Gravitystorm but the page is 404.
I'm thinking of ordering a bunch, so if the jackets aren't available,
maybe
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Names_localization
+1, generally; but I'm not keen on deprecating the bare name=* tag,
because for many (perhaps most) named features, there is only one
name. For example, a minor rural road in England will probably have a
name (in
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've decided
to adopt the scheme:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does refer
to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
Oh wauw. We're not perfect. Let's close up the shop. Thanks to SteveC for
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, if a road has no classification, and is made of mud and gravel,
it's a track...
The ones I reclassified typically had two wheel-tracks of soil-colour
and grass between them, I think. If it's
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Worst Fixer worstfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I propose removal of addr:housenumber=? on these objects, and move
name=N to addr:housenumber=N.
I think that should be done only when the name=N is actually a number.
__John
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Rob Nickerson
rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Was thinking more along the line of asking him is he minds us using his
photos to add the extra details to OSM (e.g. ref numbers, collection times,
and royal cyphers).
Or we could invite him to sign up to OSM
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, this is a great topic!
There is one more issue with internalization and names. Users tend to add
more than just names in name=* tags.
For example Lago di Garda. If a machine tried to turn that into English,
it
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Spod OSM spod...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.japantoday.com/category/lifestyle/view/crowds-create-wikipedia-style-maps-of-the-world?utm_campaign=jt_newsletterutm_medium=emailutm_source=jt_newsletter_2012-03-22_AM
Good -- they even mention it's data rather than
I started to work on Hampshire, but got the following request from a decliner:
I was wondering if you would mind refraining from 're-mapping' my
contributions for the time being? I'm still in discussions with the OSMF
regarding re-licensing some of my contributions which come from a 3rd party
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Oliver O'Brien m...@oliverobrien.co.uk wrote:
Hi
This appears to be a vandalism changeset: 10947970
Details: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10947970
It would be great if there was a report obvious vandalism button on
Changeset information
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Odd Gustafsson odd_lars...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yeah, adding: bridge=yes, foot=no, layer=5, oneway=-1 and surface=grass, to
a road happens to me all the time ;)
Sorry, didn't look closely enough! I just saw the odd-shaped road.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me, or are there more timeout magnifying glasses than usual?
I've been getting that too.
__John
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me, or are there more timeout magnifying glasses than usual?
I've been getting that too.
__John
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
The logical centre and the geometrical centre aren't necessarily
anywhere near each other --- for example, what is generally thought of
as the city centre of Cambridge UK is some way west of the crossing
point between the lines between the northmost and southmost, and
westmost and eastmost, points
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
grumble Why create a key generator:power_source rather than just use
power_source. power_source is much more generic so you could re-cycle it
for things like district heating, but generator:power_source is only ever
Something I'd like to have a way of highlighting, as I've been doing
quite a bit of electricity distribution mapping, is power lines /
minor_lines that end in something other than a transformer or pole.
(In fact, any non-power tags on a power line are probably suspect, but
one ending in an
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't really see the value of a generic noexit=yes tag - it can and
should be inferred from the network. But finding dead ends can be
valuable for tagging the countless turning circles / cul-de-sacs that
exist in
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't really see the value of a generic noexit=yes tag - it can and
should be inferred from the network. But finding dead ends can be
valuable for tagging the countless turning circles / cul-de-sacs that
exist in
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
Contributor Guy has now accepted the new contributor terms and OSMI License
View is already showing the new picture [1].
I had done some remapping in that area, before Guy agreed --- could
someone now revert those
I've started to remap an area that I don't know from first-hand
experience, as it's got a particularly high concentration of data that
was mapped by a decliner. I'm remapping it from Bing (deleting old
data and re-tracing it) which means that I lose the road names. I
don't think this is
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
It looks like you've picked Exeter - a place I was also considering
looking at when chance permits.
Yes, I've started on Exeter.
Don't let my having started on it put you or others off doing
likewise! I picked an arbitrary
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
It looks like you've picked Exeter - a place I was also considering
looking at when chance permits.
The main decliner in the Exeter area has now accepted, so much less
need now. I'll try to get my changes in that area reverted.
I've looked a bit further into disabled access to crossings, and
raised it on the accessability mailing list, and found that there is a
proposal to map crossing islands already
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_island).
After mailing about this, I then realized that it
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
the concept seems to be documented here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/UUID
I don't see any mention of what should happen to UUIDs attached to
ways, when ways are split or merged. Should
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Importing is difficult enough to do properly and I think updating that data is
even more difficult to do.
I think it would make more sense for some kinds of data (particularly,
the more volatile ones) to have map servers
I'd be interested in attending such a meeting; possibly in helping to
organize, depending on where it's hosted.
__John
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
One problem I'd see around here is that this kind
of data is not very stable (usually the dead remain only for 20 years
in their graves, not for eternity, but this depends on the religion
and local culture).
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
For something like this, where there is very limited overlap between past
and present, it makes sense to use a separate database. But in cases where
most of the features still exist, such as railways or Roman roads,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, can you describe the freeze? ...
As Richard (albeit fairly bluntly) said, we've not heard similar
reports from other people, but they might just be silently enduring
it. Any further help you can give us to get to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I think there's always been a memory leak there with P2; I've noticed that
sort of behaviour for months. I've only done minimal bits of delving into
it, but suspect it's a case of _either_ some sprites being left
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I should be more specific: this person goes to maps.google.com, they see a
big map with a search box, they enter an address and pan around to look at
their house or
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
I agree with you when a large amount of new people start the quality
can go down. My theory is there needs to be a certain ratio of senior
mappers to new people to keep the quality high. However I think as
people learn
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
What do other people think? If there's a strong view not to have these
parenthesised bits there, I'll take them out of the name tags.
I think it would be best to have the information somewhere, in a
consistent form
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2011 10:02, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
. Yes, “Former Brewery” is the former
Ridley’s site. Bishop Nick launched their first beer at The Compasses,
Littley Green (next village over) recently;
I'm sure this is a cider brewery, I've driven past it quite a few
times and remember seeing the signage. (I used to live near
Limerick). I don't know of any beers from Bulmers, I'm pretty sure
they're only ciders.
__John
On 11/20/11, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
This was
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Borbus bor...@gmail.com wrote:
distillery=whisky
Do we need to make a distinction between whisky and whiskey? I don't
know much about whiskey, I seem to remember the difference is more than
just spelling.
Whisky (Scottish) is distilled twice (and the smoke
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Graham
the one
or two vineyards in the South
There's some disgreement on how to tag these
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Vineyard),
between
landuse=vineyard
and
landuse=agriculture
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am interested in creating maps of historical features (e.g all roman
remains, medieval things, World War 2 things etc.).
This could be extended to cover more everyday things, I suppose, but
that would
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
I recently mapped a couple of Police Memorial Trust memorials, for example:
http://www.policememorial.org.uk/Police_Memorial_Trust/PMT_Local_Memorials/PMT-Swindells-2004/PMT-Swindells-2004.htm
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Nicola Smith nicolasmit...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I appreciate it is something we don't necessarily map, but has anyone seen
any gas/oil marker posts on their travels? I am interested in the
sub-surface layout
Me too --- I've been mapping quite a few
There's also a water pipeline heading northeast (again, visible on
osmarender) at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.2165490686893lon=0.0422796607017517zoom=17
-- I remember it being built (I used to live near there). Again, I
traced it as far as I could from bing.
__John
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:56:51AM +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Would it make more sense to categorize by the tag? For example:
*FIXME:name=yes
*FIXME:maxspeed=verify that the entire road is 55 mph
We don't
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
FIXME=Do these roads join here? Not clear on Bing imagery. Survey needed.
That will be a useful note for somebody planning to visit the area later so
they can check this place if they wish.
How about starting a convention
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Only manually detected problems should be tagged with fixme. And it should be
as easy as possible to mark those. Extra categorization would make it more
difficult.
I don't think it makes it significantly more difficult, as
The edit tab isn't working for me -- neither on my home machine, nor
if I ssh through to my work machine. (Both running iceweasel on
Debian, and I haven't reconfigured anything since it last worked for
me.) The slippy map and placename search seem to be OK. Is anyone
else getting this?
__John
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:43 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
What flash player are you using? I seem to remember reading that FP 10 was
needed now...
... ah - here we are:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/potlatch-dev/2011-September/001220.html
That'll probably
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 AM, kenneth gonsalves
law...@thenilgiris.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:49 +0200, Erik Johansson wrote:
90% of my mapping is in such areas - gps, josm and repeated visits
to
the area are needed. Camera and laser range finder are a plus.
Do you actually use
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Even today, I would find it confusing to edit a group of objects which have
source tags - it would be more intuitive to put the source in the changeset,
That makes sense to me --- surely most changes in a changeset will
have the
66 matches
Mail list logo