On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
The associatedStreet relation has the streetname in 'name', not in
addr:street. I also found some relations where this was done incorrectly.
It is possible to fix all of them in one go. Advise me if you want me to do
so.
Do you
The remark I made was about the associatedStreet relation. The name of the
street is put in the name tag, just like it is done on the ways forming the
street. So all other tags are addr:country, addr:city, addr:postcode, but
the streetname goes into name.
Everyone is free to add addr:street to
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
@Jan-Willem: I wouldn't take away the addr:street from the houses and POIs
when you add them to an associatedStreet relation. I tried that once, a few
years ago, and had to revert because portable editors didn't support
relations
I've added most of those addresses in Reet.
I use JOSM all the time to create associatedStreet relations.
I vaguely remember seeing a different behavior at a certain point, where
JOSM started adding addr:street tags to the buildings when its building
tool creates an associatedStreet relation. Is
This is what I would propose:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1919939/history
addr:city, addr:postcode, addr:country, and maybe addr:state, although I'd
prefer addr:province there go in the associatedStreet relation. The name of
the street goes into name. This way it becomes usable
2013/1/7 Jan-willem De Bleser j...@thescrapyard.org
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who says that the closest street is in the associatedstreet relation.
That
relation has nothing to do with the closest street, only with the
administrative
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 08:17:11AM +0100, Jo wrote:
The associatedStreet relation has the streetname in 'name', not in
addr:street. I also found some relations where this was done incorrectly.
It is possible to fix all of them in one go. Advise me if you want me to do
so.
As far as I
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's administrative, it's not necessarily the closest. I have given an
example of it, but there are multiple examples, like for this house:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/174076563, it's in gemeente Staden,
2013/1/7 Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:06:02PM +, Jan-willem De Bleser wrote:
Of course, that leads me to the question of Why do
we add addr:city at all, assuming that every house is fully within a
city's boundaries?
The only reason I can see that being useful
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Sander Deryckere wrote:
The first thing you notice is that there are a lot of features with
housenumber information, but without street information. While other
information (such as city) can be determined from closed boundaries. It's
often ambiguous
The associatedStreet relation has the streetname in 'name', not in
addr:street. I also found some relations where this was done incorrectly.
It is possible to fix all of them in one go. Advise me if you want me to do
so.
Polyglot
2013/1/7 Joren joren.libreoff...@telenet.be
Op 07-01-13 00:35,
Frederik Ramm developed a script that takes history into account:
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/housenumbers.html
It does a lot more credit to the work of Ivodeb around Korbeek-Lo and
Bierbeek. The numbers are also for worldwide edits instead of only Belgium.
Happy New Year (well almost),
PS: I'm using a lot of geocoding when I truly mean 'reverse
geocode', I only focus in getting full addresses back from
coordinates.
That's probably the main difference. I focus on geocoding (getting
coordinates from an address). And when you have long streets without
On 23-dec.-2012, at 12:28, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com wrote:
Now the street network is good as complete (we even have streets in the DB
that are still under construction). So we need to focus on other things.
Those things are (according to me):
Addresses including housenumbers
Hi Chris,
The easiest way is to simply add addr:housenumber nodes. It's hard to do
anything wrong with that. For good measure add addr:street as well. On
Android you can use the latest version of Vespucci. It works quite well,
but it's not a lot of use without an internet connection (3G or WLAN).
2012/12/22 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com
After the articles about the addresses in Germany (where every average
German contributor should gather 1000 addresses), I wondered how we were
doing in Belgium. So I downloaded the address information in Belgium and
did some counting.
I only
16 matches
Mail list logo
