The associatedStreet relation has the streetname in 'name', not in
addr:street. I also found some relations where this was done incorrectly.

It is possible to fix all of them in one go. Advise me if you want me to do
so.

Polyglot

2013/1/7 Joren <joren.libreoff...@telenet.be>

> Op 07-01-13 00:35, Kurt Roeckx schreef:
>
>  On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Sander Deryckere wrote:
>>
>>> The first thing you notice is that there are a lot of features with
>>> housenumber information, but without street information. While other
>>> information (such as city) can be determined from closed boundaries. It's
>>> often ambiguous and hard to determine the street from other OSM features.
>>>
>> Osmose counts alot of errors in Belgium because of that.  See:
>> http://osmose.openstreetmap.**fr/errors/graph.png?country=**belgium<http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/errors/graph.png?country=belgium>
>>
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/**osmi/?view=addresses&lon=4.**
> 41356&lat=51.10370&zoom=14&**baselayer=Geofabrik&opacity=1.**
> 00&overlays=no_addr_street,**street_not_found<http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=4.41356&lat=51.10370&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik&opacity=1.00&overlays=no_addr_street,street_not_found>
>
> Geofabrik shows that there are many 'bugs' in the city 'Reet' ... but when
> I examine it, some/all houses are tagged with 'associatedStreet
> <streetname>, etc'...
> Is this the correct tagging, or do we need to delete that tag, and tag
> them with 'addr:street'?
>
>
>
>> About 50% of those are because of missing addr:street or
>> associatedStreet relation.
>>
>> It would in general be a good thing that we try and fix all those
>> errors.
>>
>>  Thanks in advance,
> Joren
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-be<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to