> And to be honest: I don't think OSM will really surpass commercial maps for
> car navigation, because up to date traffic information is part of that.
> I don't see how volunteers can arrange that quickly.
In some countries (including Belgium) traffic information from the
government is open
If it'sn't a place=locality, but only a cadastral name with known
boundary, a boundary=cadastral + name is better
the problem is that it is often places said that the elders used
without precise limits and it is then taken up by the land registry
and notaries, for example to locate a famrland
Le
Mij lijkt dit enkel een kwestie van "minder-dan-perfecte" tagging: in
plaats van "name=HoutchiPloutch" hoort het voor mij te zijn
"name:land_register=..." of iets dergelijks.De tag "place=locality"
lijkt mij trouwens ook aanvechtbaar.
A mon avis, il suffit d'appliquer un tag plus correcte ou
Hi Eebie,
you have a point that indeed those maps are confusing the way OSM renders
them at the site.
But with mapping: there is a difference between what is in the database and
what is displayed.
If what you see is not clear, then perhaps the renderer should be adapted.
As I said in an earlier
I have a problem with a kind of exaggerated detailed mapping that makes
the map difficult to read and use.
That is by giving fields and meadows their cadastral name by mapping
them as place=locality and name=*.
You can find this in some parts of Wallonie as
