Quoting Nicolas Pettiaux (2020-05-16 14:59:41)
> > No! You need prior permission to take a photo of a person.
>
> can you provide a legal text with that ?
No, I don't have the resources to search our law. The online lookup tools of
the government are not
adequate for that.
The best I can get
Quoting Marc Gemis (2020-05-16 14:59:43)
> According to
> https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/recht-op-afbeelding-de-privacywet-algemeen,
>
> "Toch geldt de Privacywet niet altijd. [...]
There are 2 panels:
* the privacy law and
* the picture rights, which are part of our copyright
Hello
> No! You need prior permission to take a photo of a person.
can you provide a legal text with that ?
I thought that we are allowed to take a picture for our personal needs
but we have to ask the permission to publish it unless special cases,
eg. as journalists. Otherwise, journalists and
According to
https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/recht-op-afbeelding-de-privacywet-algemeen,
"Toch geldt de Privacywet niet altijd. Beelden voor louter
persoonlijke of huishoudelijke doeleinden, zoals een familiealbum
aanleggen of privéopnames maken bij een sportmanifestatie, is de
On Fri, May 15, 2020, 19:38 Marc Gemis wrote:
> Taking pictures of people is not a problem, it's what you do with them
> afterwards that is important.
Op vr 15 mei 2020 22:51 schreef Sander Deryckere :
> Taking a picture is usually not illegal indeed.
No! You need prior permission to take a
Afaik, Belgium changed the law one or two years ago and you can now
publish pictures of art and buildings without problems. Wikimedia changed
its policy for such pictures at that moment
m
Op vr 15 mei 2020 22:51 schreef Sander Deryckere :
> Taking a picture is usually not illegal indeed. But
Taking a picture is usually not illegal indeed. But sharing it in many
cases is. Next to the privacy regulations already mentioned, people can ask
to take pictures of their property offline on Google Streetview.
Google certainly has a good legal team, and blurring those pictures does
cost some
Not only their faces, also license plates. And if you're doing it manually
maybe also stickers with recognisable information.
Jo
On Fri, May 15, 2020, 19:38 Marc Gemis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see no difference between contributing to OpenStreetMap via JOSM and
> iD or StreetComplete.
> Mapping a
Hello,
I see no difference between contributing to OpenStreetMap via JOSM and
iD or StreetComplete.
Mapping a house, street, waste bin, etc. will not break any privacy.
We do not map the names of the inhabitants of a house. Mapping items
from someone's garden based on aerial imagery might be on
Hello,
a question about privacy of people in general (not the mapper) (in
Belgium)
when contributing using for example streetcomplete:
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete
answering the questions, i suppose this is ok juridical?
when taking pictures to make it clear for the mappers,
i
10 matches
Mail list logo
