On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 20:48 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, William Lachance wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I frankly just don't see the
purpose in
tagging our data differently from the rest of the world, when we can
achieve the desired end (comparing OSM data
- William Lachance arranged a host of electrons thusly: -
Having the uuids around also make it easier to talk about
differences/errors between OSM and geobase data. Someone can look
at a road in OSM and easily find the original GeoBase road (using
your favourite gis tool) and compare
Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM, William Lachancewrl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 10:28 -0400, Gerald A wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Corey Burger corey.bur...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
1) start fresh (streets/road-wise), enjoy correct topology
and
Corey,
In my original message (as opposed to a snippet you quoted), I
suggest that matching geobase UUID is equivalent to throwing out the
data, if not position-wise, then topology-wise. We can take the easy
way or a hard way, but end result will be pretty much the same.
Avoiding pissing off
Hmm, did I say more authoritative? I thought it was something like
more consistent and topologically correct.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Gerald A (geraldabli...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Corey Burger corey.bur...@gmail.comwrote:
snip
1) start
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Michael
Barabanovmichael.baraba...@gmail.com wrote:
Corey,
In my original message (as opposed to a snippet you quoted), I
suggest that matching geobase UUID is equivalent to throwing out the
data, if not position-wise, then topology-wise. We can take the easy
Meanwhile, for the existing process I've added After the Import section to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase_NRN_-_OSM_Map_Feature
It's also mentioned it in How can I help.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoBase_Import
Michael.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:34:29PM -0700, Michael
That's a possibility, though RoadMatcher is the tool for exactly this
purpose. For now, after the import, in problematic places I compare
the topologies by opening the resulting .osm file from geobase2osm
script (not the standalone, but the whole thing) as another layer. Then
data can be
I've found a way[1], which appears to have come in with this import,
but is incorrectly named. I checked out the Geobase website and found
their viewing tool[2], but I can't see the names for the NRN ways.
How can I check whether this is, in fact, an error in the NRN data?
Secondly, when I fix
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Adam Glauser wrote:
I've found a way[1], which appears to have come in with this import,
but is incorrectly named. I checked out the Geobase website and found
their viewing tool[2], but I can't see the names for the NRN ways.
How can I check whether this is, in fact, an
Adam Glauser wrote:
I've found a way[1], which appears to have come in with this import,
but is incorrectly named. I checked out the Geobase website and found
their viewing tool[2], but I can't see the names for the NRN ways.
How can I check whether this is, in fact, an error in the NRN data?
11 matches
Mail list logo
