Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bégin, Daniel wrote: > Hi Mike, > > You did not miss anything, you are giving comments on a sample - as expected! > > - About missing names, Canvec features are not named. However you can find > some toponyms. > - About missing tags on multipolygon. The tags have

[Talk-ca] Only 378 features in CanVec - wiki cleanup help needed.

Hi all, Currently, there are still duplicate wiki charts listing the canvec features. The chart i initially made, & the one Daniel made for the 'inhouse canvec.osm' All of the changes have been checked by multiple mappers, so the latest sample version tags should be correct. Im going through the

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

Hi Mike, You did not miss anything, you are giving comments on a sample - as expected! - About missing names, Canvec features are not named. However you can find some toponyms. - About missing tags on multipolygon. The tags have been placed at relation level, not on inner or outer ways. - About

[Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

I think I may have missed the goal here? Are we evaluating the OSM files and trying to make the source better or just requesting OSM files and putting them in? I'm ready to go if we're just putting them in. ;-) ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@opens

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa has voted to release its data.

I've been talking to Ottawa's CIO and he understands the licensing concerns. Apparently they are thinking of changing it but what would be useful is a internal OSM consensus on whether ODbL or PDDL is best. I understand that new people who sign up to OSM are being asked to release under ODbL. Th

[Talk-ca] bzip/gzip compression of canvec.osm files instead of .zip

Hi, JohnSmith (on the #osm-ca IRC chat) says that using gzip[1] or bzip[2] instead of the .zip file which is currently being used, would allow for JOSM to open up the file directly (without needing to unzip it), since it is only 1 file, and there is no need to recurse the directories. I haven't