Richard,
I am planning to contact some non-agreeing OSM users in my area. How
easy is it for a non-agreeing OSM user to change to the new CT/ODbL? Will they
be prompted to agree when they login to OSM? Or is there another link(s) that
I should give them?
Thanks,
Bernie.
--
Bernie
Hi Bernie,
here's what I've used as a template. Worked with one mapper, didn't work (i.e.
no response) with five others.
Best,
Harald.
-%--
Dear xxx,
I'm a mapper from Montreal and while checking my area for potential problems
with the upcoming license change, I've noticed that
Harald,
Thanks for the suggestion. But what can we do if a user is no longer
using OSM? If they are not using OSM they will not see the message that we
send to their OSM Inbox. I presume there is nothing we can do unless we have
the time to do a little detective work and try to find
It gets forwarded to their normal email address.
Cheerio John
On 12 January 2012 10:54, Connors, Bernie (SNB) bernie.conn...@snb.cawrote:
Harald,
Thanks for the suggestion. But what can we do if a user is no
longer using OSM? If they are not using OSM they will not see the message
Hi All,
There is a huge section in my area that have no user associated to it.
Is there a way to retrieve the original user and contact them? It seems
to be an import from an official data source, but there is no
information on what it is.
Yannick
On 2012-01-11 15:44, Richard Weait wrote:
I've used several different templates. The current one takes a little
research. I like to add the specific location they mapped, and when
and a specific object. I hope that this reminds a mapper of their
previous contribution and demonstrates something that interested them
enough to put it into
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Yannick Brosseau
yannick.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
There is a huge section in my area that have no user associated to it.
Anonymous edits and anonymous accounts were permitted in OSM in the
early days. Some of those objects still exist in the
Richard Weait wrote on 2012-01-12 11:30:40
I've used several different templates. The current one takes a little
research. I like to add the specific location they mapped, and when
and a specific object. I hope that this reminds a mapper of their
previous contribution and demonstrates
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, James Ewen ve6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
1) I look at the license status of the area in the course of my normal
mapping. While mapping, I make sure to clean problematic objects
rather than just
I'm still a little confused on how a user that does not accept the new
license can simply touch a node or way, and make it so that we have to
completely remove the data and recreate it.
vreimer seems to have touched a great deal of ways across Canada,
which sparked the banning of his account
vreimer seems to have touched a great deal of ways across Canada,
which sparked the banning of his account quite a while ago. He is
listed as being contacted, but we have never seen a response from this
user, at least that I know of.
I think we need to review this on an almost case by case
11 matches
Mail list logo
