Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] SOTM US Portland - Call for participation

2012-08-03 Thread James Ewen
Could have been worse... it might have been held in Springfield! James VE6SRV On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: >> Do you have a story or project to share at State Of The Map US, >> Portland Oct 13-14? Now is the time to submit your abstract! >> ... > > >> >> See you all in Por

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] SOTM US Portland - Call for participation

2012-08-03 Thread Bill Ricker
> > Do you have a story or project to share at State Of The Map US, > Portland Oct 13-14? Now is the time to submit your abstract! > ... > See you all in Portland! > One assumes you mean the new Portland Oregon not old Portland Maine. (Is it too much to expect OSM'ers of all people to realize

Re: [Talk-ca] CFB Borden and Meaford

2012-08-03 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Harald Kliems wrote: >> While browsing the map I noticed that the CFBs Borden and Meaford show >> up on the standard Mapnik mak in very low zoom levels (z=6). >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.28&lon=

Re: [Talk-ca] CFB Borden and Meaford

2012-08-03 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Harald Kliems wrote: > While browsing the map I noticed that the CFBs Borden and Meaford show > up on the standard Mapnik mak in very low zoom levels (z=6). > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.28&lon=-80.06&zoom=6&layers=M > > The reason appears to be that the

[Talk-ca] CFB Borden and Meaford

2012-08-03 Thread Harald Kliems
While browsing the map I noticed that the CFBs Borden and Meaford show up on the standard Mapnik mak in very low zoom levels (z=6). http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.28&lon=-80.06&zoom=6&layers=M The reason appears to be that they're tagged as place=city. According to the wiki this tag should