I personally don't consider adding prefixes as 'tagging for the map'. They are
VERY useful for routers as well. Plus, to be honest, there should be a way to
easily identify what type a route is, especially when it changes between
classifications, like {3} does several times. Especially if {3}
Hi Kevin
> Andrewpmk (almost entirely him) and I reversed all of the ON prefixes
> to the 400-Series highways
Many thanks to you both for doing that.
> Personally I don't think there should be any prefix for rendering or
> navigation purposes, but I guess it depends on whether you think
> county
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:51 PM, James Mast wrote:
> Well Kevin,
>
> Well, it seems that the edits from 'OntarioEditor' along the entire 405 were
> missed and still have the 'ON' in the ref tag on the ways.
>
> As for the new user doing it, it's 'North American Highways'. I sent him
> both a PM a
Well Kevin,
Well, it seems that the edits from 'OntarioEditor' along the entire 405 were
missed and still have the 'ON' in the ref tag on the ways.
As for the new user doing it, it's 'North American Highways'. I sent him both
a PM and a comment on a changeset [1] directing him here to the mail
(Sorry I have to re-email this Daniel - I thought I pressed reply all :P)
It was discussed in February in this thread:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2015-February/006404.html
Andrewpmk (almost entirely him) and I reversed all of the ON prefixes to
the 400-Series highways, but
AFAIK, it has never been discussed at least on this forum. I consider it as
an error or even vandalism since it does not conform to acceptable rules (1)
A similar behavior has been seen a couple of months ago where
user:OntarioEditor added a prefix to ref tag for most primary/secondary
roads in
6 matches
Mail list logo
