After reading through the changeset discussion, I discovered that one of my
imports in Northern Manitoba made Worst of OSM. (
http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/post/22180046353/dear-openstreetmap-isnt-it-strange-how-the).
As someone who spends a some time amount of time in some of relatively
On 2016-08-30 09:18 AM, James wrote:
> He's even going to revert my work:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41776742
> I've forwarded this to the DWG, it's getting rediculous.
Using a dedicated account for imports is one of the few "musts". Nakaner
may be being a little officious here, but
No problem,
I am not sure about the best way to deal with wooded areas. Canvec product was
created with “layers” and merging them manually in a multipolygon is quite
difficult.
I usually correct everything that is reasonable such as merging water in wooded
multipolygon, transferring text nodes
Sorry I'm a very sarcastic person and have trouble decerning if people are
sarcastic or not.
Anyways what should we do with canvec tiles? Should we correct as much as
possible leaving only 0-10 warnings(there are nodes that are tagged as
land, but there's island names or other relevant info aka
No sarcasm at all, why?
Sorry you got that impression ☹
Daniel
From: James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August, 2016 20:50
To: Begin Daniel
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap; john whelan; Adam Martin
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada
Not sure if you are
Not sure if you are sarcastic or serious... but anyways, I'm glad the rest
of talk-ca feels the same way(sorry for highjacking fix the forest thread
even though it was kind of related)
On Aug 30, 2016 8:43 PM, "Begin Daniel" wrote:
Wow, same ideas, same concerns, provided
Wow, same ideas, same concerns, provided independently...
That is cool!
Daniel
From: Adam Martin [mailto:s.adam.mar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August, 2016 19:15
To: john whelan
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada
I've contacted him as well.
I've contacted him as well. Here's what I sent:
Good day, Nakaner
I am a resident of Canada and a contributor to OSM here. Looking over your
profile, you have over 5,500 edits across the OSM project, making you a
skilled mapper. It has come to the attention of the Canadian OSM community
recently
But Daniel's comments make sense, I'm not sure we should go for this type
of approach.
Still I concur with them. On the forests there is an issue but its not
open to a simplistic approach and hence difficult to resolve.
John
On 30 August 2016 at 18:28, James wrote:
> I'm
I'm totally in agreement with Daniel, especially that it creates a hostile
community
On Aug 30, 2016 6:05 PM, "Pierre Béland" wrote:
> +1
>
> J'invite les autres contributeurs canadiens à indiquer leur accord avec le
> message de Daniel. :)
>
> I invite other canadian OSM
+1
J'invite les autres contributeurs canadiens à indiquer leur accord avec le
message de Daniel. :)
I invite other canadian OSM contributors to express their agreement with Daniel
message. :)
Pierre
De : Begin Daniel
À : James ; Adam Martin
I have contacted the user that is about/has deleted some changesets imported
from Canvec. I may agree on some of his comments but totally disagree on the
method he is using to make his point.
I do not know what the DWG will do about this guy but here is the message I
sent him...
Bonjour
He's even going to revert my work:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41776742
I've forwarded this to the DWG, it's getting rediculous.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Adam Martin
wrote:
> That's a pretty harsh thing to deal with. Imports are difficult and the
>
That's a pretty harsh thing to deal with. Imports are difficult and the
time needed to get them right is not a small investment. To have someone
review this work is a valuable service, but I don't think just blanket
reverting due to the violation of one rule is the solution, especially in
context
Andrew, I hear you! I have been trying to add data around unmapped Northern
Communities around James Bay and Nunavut. But after someone revert some of
my work I'm stopping:(
John
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:47 -0400,
Andrew, you best be careful there is a german that is reverting CanVec
imports for stupid little reasons see:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39517002
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:47 -0400, Gordon Dewis wrote:
>
>
Effectivement, nous essayons de progresser collectivement. Effacer ce qui a été
fait n'est pas une solution. Et nous hésitions à compléter l'import d'immenses
zones au nord du Canada dû aux divers problèmes rencontrés.
Il m'arrive à l'occasion de couper un grand polygone représentant une forêt
On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 23:47 -0400, Gordon Dewis wrote:
>
> > On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Antoine Beaupré
> > org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-08-25 10:13:25, Gordon Dewis wrote:
> > > Alan is right. I've brought in a few tiles worth of forests from
> > > Canvec in
> > > the area you're talking
18 matches
Mail list logo