I didn't even go look at the edit. I've seen so many fake parks lately I
just automatically assumed the worst. My apologies to Denis001 for
assuming it was related to Pokemon.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM, James wrote:
> seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it
seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it was
just a mistake.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Clifford Snow
wrote:
> It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
> recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message
> with
It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message
with help in how to edit. I provide new users with a link to this blog on
editing for Pokemon,
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
Clif
Salut Pierre, J'ai vu le lac sur un node de Canvec que je peux appliquer
aux outline:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570780237#map=17/48.63602/-70.54527&layers=D
C'est ce qui ma fait penser qu'il l'a appliqué à la forêt et non le lac
2017-02-22 15:39 GMT-05:00 Pierre Béland :
> Bonjour James
Bonjour James
Le nom de lac devrait etre appliqué au lac et nom a ce multipolygone décrivant
les forets. Et je ne crois pas qu'il y aie un parc a cet endroit. Le Parc des
monts Valin est un peu plus loin.
Pour référence sur les noms de lacs, voir la toponymie du
Québechttp://www.toponymie.gouv.q
I've noticed something going on in the map:
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1944638
Denis001 has added leisure=park to a Canvec forest and a Lake's name. I'm
pretty sure that he ment to add it to the lake itself and not the forest
relation. Just wondering what you think? Should
6 matches
Mail list logo