Re: [Talk-ca] Radio-Canada - Carte Google premières nations est la meilleure - Réagissez

2017-06-29 Thread Pierre Béland
Variables pour identifier les communautés autochtones du Canada Pour montrer l'utilité d'ajouter des variables de communautés, j'ai ajouté les variables indigenous pour les Inuits, les Cris et les Innus du Québec. Si on s'entend sur une classification à utiliser, il sera ensuite facile de

Re: [Talk-ca] Radio-Canada - Carte Google premières nations est la meilleure - Réagissez

2017-06-29 Thread Pierre Béland
Merci James et John Les données open.canada.ca nous permettent de vérifier et ajouter si nécessaire les noms de chaque village / communauté. Je vais proposer plus bas des noms de variables pour permettre de faire des requêtes pour extraire les données sur ces communautés autochtones. Puis

Re: [Talk-ca] Radio-Canada - Carte Google premières nations est la meilleure - Réagissez

2017-06-29 Thread john whelan
The Northwest Territories has 11 official languages by the way. Cheerio John 2017-06-29 14:49 GMT-04:00 john whelan : > Have we any contacts at INAC? This strikes me as being something the > locals are best equipped to handle especially if we point out we can handle >

Re: [Talk-ca] Radio-Canada - Carte Google premières nations est la meilleure - Réagissez

2017-06-29 Thread john whelan
Have we any contacts at INAC? This strikes me as being something the locals are best equipped to handle especially if we point out we can handle the native script for names. I think INAC are best placed to coordinate this or possibly gov.nt.ca. Cheerio John 2017-06-29 14:30 GMT-04:00 James

Re: [Talk-ca] Radio-Canada - Carte Google premières nations est la meilleure - Réagissez

2017-06-29 Thread James
Au cas que le monde ont besoin des endroids ou se trouve les premieres nations le Canada a ses donnees: First Nations Location dataset: http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/b6567c5c-8339-4055-99fa-63f92114d9e4 Inuit Communities Location dataset:

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #362 2017-06-20-2017-06-26

2017-06-29 Thread weeklyteam
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 362, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9199/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread James
I can already see the Rideau Mall roof top as being an exception (there's a giant garden on the roof) On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Denis Carriere wrote: > There's many of us that are from the local Ottawa area, we will make sure > we capture those exceptions. I am

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread Denis Carriere
There's many of us that are from the local Ottawa area, we will make sure we capture those exceptions. I am sure in the Downtown area we will find some valid trees that are completely within the building (green spaces on top of a roof). *~~* *Denis Carriere* *GIS Software & Systems

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread Rory McCann
Hi. I think there's been a misunderstand, maybe I'm not being clear. I did some quick analysis of the data & current OSM data. There are about 622 trees which are inside a building. about 300 which are <1m from the centre line of a road. For example there are some trees-inside-buildings around

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 29. Jun 2017, at 14:01, Rory McCann wrote: > > When doing an import, it's important that someone does this sort of > work. That's part of the process of doing an import, to learn more about > the accuracy of the data you have, and to check how it

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 29. Jun 2017, at 13:07, James wrote: > > This is probably why dbh is used as the diameter only changes a tiny fraction > of the circumferance per year, so the data is less stale and you dont have to > audit them every year there's really no

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread James
We are aware of the Canvec interpolations and cleaning them up(residential areas with 100% coverage, we keep them in vast areas where new buildings might be built as to not miss any potential areas) so that process is on going... On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Rory McCann

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread Denis Carriere
Thanks Rory, Knowing that there's 622 trees in buildings is good information, the import should definitely have a look at those specific trees and exclude them from the import (tackling them manually is a good idea). The building interpolation & building address issue should be discussed as a

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa, Canada Tree Import

2017-06-29 Thread James
This is probably why dbh is used as the diameter only changes a tiny fraction of the circumferance per year, so the data is less stale and you dont have to audit them every year On Jun 28, 2017 9:21 PM, "Max Erickson" wrote: > > > On Jun 28, 2017 6:46 PM, "Kyle Nuttall"