he District is based on
> the
> assessor parcels. Given what you said (I'm assuming you are in the
> Northern VA suburbs of DC), have you looked into whether Fairfax
> County
> or Alexandria has released their parcel or centerline road data?
>
> Dan
>
> On Sun,
Hi Dan,
Both manual and donated data. I've been addressing my neighborhood in
Virginia but Washington D.C. donated point level addresses.
Kate Chapman
On Nov 15, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Dan Putler
wrote:
> Hi Kate,
>
> How have the address points been obtained? From OSM use
f the address and the way of the road
would not be on top of each other.
Is this incorrect?
-Kate Chapman
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
> > What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situation
Dan,
What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations where we
have point level address data? Or are you just referring to not importing
the addressing that is available for the Tiger data?
Kate Chapman
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun,
I also think UUID is important in the case of imported data. It will
ease the update of datasets that we bring in.
Kate Chapman
On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Sam removed that context, then spun this new thread and widened
> distribution! Here's some c
Andy,
I suspect it will not help with every single geometry, but I think there
will be plenty of untouched ones though.
Unfortunately I do not have a specific example of a situation where this has
worked, but it seems better than the alternative of not using any UUIDs.
For example importing all o
6 matches
Mail list logo
