Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

Whoa whoa whoa, I manually imported data from peel open data on my own time. By import I mean I traced out the ranged and manually typed in the addresses. Before I get in trouble... On Feb 12, 2016 7:36 AM, "Stewart C. Russell" wrote: > Hi again Mojgan — > > > … I noticed

Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

Hi, "...This would be okay (and preferable) if the node addresses were consecutive, but some of the ones I saw were longer. If you still have the data, I remember seeing this at the intersection of Kennedy Road and Eglinton Avenue East, on the east side of Kennedy. It would be at/near the south

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

On 2016-02-09 09:24 AM, Begin Daniel wrote: > > 1 - Stewart is right about questioning the StatsCan license... Mojgan updated the import wiki page yesterday with a note and link to the open.canada.ca Road Network Files - 2015

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

Cool! -Original Message- From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com] Sent: February-10-16 08:58 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps On 2016-02-09 09:24 AM, Begin Daniel wrote: >

Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

Hi all, As you can find in our wikipage, we resolve the issue of licensing by using Open Government data portal which use Open Government License-Canada accepted by OSM. StatCan 2015 road network is part of this portal. For accuracy and consistency issue, as I mentioned we validate our result

Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

for lower classification. These values were requested by the community but for aesthetic purposes only. Daniel From: Mojgan Jadidi [mailto:mojgan.jad...@gmail.com] Sent: February-10-16 09:25 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

This is all great news. I have been working to get the Federal Government in Ottawa to use OSM for years, and this will help to get even more organization on board. John Marshall On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Mojgan Jadidi wrote: > Dear all, > Following to our

Re: [Talk-ca] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Mojgan Jadidi wrote: For accuracy and consistency issue, as I mentioned we validate our result with imagery data and geosbase road segment geometry following with an extensive visual inspection. Our visual inspection is on-going step and never stops!. What is the plan

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps Hi Mojgan, Thanks for sticking with us! And also for including the sample data as an attachment. One observation: Statistics Canada does not use the Open Government Canada Licence

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx, Second attemps

Hi Mojgan, Thanks for sticking with us! And also for including the sample data as an attachment. One observation: Statistics Canada does not use the Open Government Canada Licence (or even a derivation of it), but its own: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/reference/licence-eng Although OSM has used