Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

Hm. Paul noted something similar. It does not sound like there is a clear consensus about how networks should be tagged then. Perhaps more people can weigh in and argue for the one or the other notation. At least the tagging is consistent now, and would be easy to change in bulk if the outcome is

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

On 2016-10-28 10:45 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > It's not documented that way anywhere that I could find. The colon > notation is. Based on the other comments and the documented standards we > started editing based on the spreadsheet. Well, it was here:

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

Looks like these have all been resolved! Thanks all for your help. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with > underscore network tags, from 2313

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with underscore network tags, from 2313 yesterday. For those interested the query is area[name=Canada]->.canada; relation ["route"="road"]["network"~"..\_.+"](area.canada); out; This does not give you any geometry. Martijn

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

On 10/27/2016 3:04 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered deviations from that

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

I created a spreadsheet to track the relations and fixes. It doesn't lend itself well to a MapRoulette challenge or I would have done that :) Includes handy direct JOSM link! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O1LGJk6r6gP6NrKYmdAuLKsc0vdNcaTH_k0F_Wjwdio/edit?usp=sharing Let me know if this

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON Good catch! *~~* *Denis Carriere* *GIS Software & Systems Specialist* *Twitter: @DenisCarriere * *OSM: DenisCarriere * GitHub:

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

They should be corrected to the proper format :) On Oct 27, 2016 6:06 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote: > Hi all, > > My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that > there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual > hierarchical

[Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

Hi all, My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an