Re: [Talk-ca] Cycling map vs Standard map

2015-11-03 Thread john whelan
You can always download the area and render it locally with Maperitive or OSMAND. Cheerio John On 3 November 2015 at 11:06, Pierre Boucher wrote: > Hi, > Can someone have and explanation (and a solution) to the fact that for the > same specific area (small area a few

Re: [Talk-ca] Cycling map vs Standard map

2015-11-03 Thread James
Any other layer apart from the standard layer takes more time to render(it's deliberately delayed) so if you have made changes recently that show up on the standard layer but not on the cycle map you might have to wait a couple days for the cycle layer to catch up (usually 2-3 days) On Tue, Nov

[Talk-ca] Cycling map vs Standard map

2015-11-03 Thread Pierre Boucher
Hi, Can someone have and explanation (and a solution) to the fact that for the same specific area (small area a few square kilometers) the cycling map is not update to the latest tags. If you compare the Cycling Map to the Standard Map for this area you will see what I mean (I hope so)

Re: [Talk-ca] Cycling map vs Standard map

2015-11-03 Thread Kevin Farrugia
Hey Pierre, It's simply that the cycle tiles are maintained and hosted outside of OSM so they aren't updated in near real-time like the standard OSM tiles are. They're taken care of by Andy Allen and you can check out his website at http://www.thunderforest.com. You could ask him how often the