Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[Martijn van Exel]

I created a spreadsheet to track the relations and fixes. It doesn't lend
itself well to a MapRoulette challenge or I would have done that :)

Includes handy direct JOSM link!

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O1LGJk6r6gP6NrKYmdAuLKsc0vdNcaTH_k0F_Wjwdio/edit?usp=sharing

Let me know if this is workable.

Martijn

Martijn van Exel
http://mvexel.github.io/

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Denis Carriere 
wrote:

> I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON
>
> Good catch!
>
> *~~*
> *Denis Carriere*
> *GIS Software & Systems Specialist*
>
> *Twitter: @DenisCarriere *
> *OSM: DenisCarriere *
> GitHub: DenisCarriere 
> Email: carriere.de...@gmail.com
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that
>> there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
>> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
>> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
>> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
>> that.
>>
>> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
>> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
>> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
>> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format
>> - it has a Canada example!
>>
>> Martijn van Exel
>> http://mvexel.github.io/
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[Denis Carriere]

I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON

Good catch!

*~~*
*Denis Carriere*
*GIS Software & Systems Specialist*

*Twitter: @DenisCarriere *
*OSM: DenisCarriere *
GitHub: DenisCarriere 
Email: carriere.de...@gmail.com

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that
> there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
> that.
>
> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format -
> it has a Canada example!
>
> Martijn van Exel
> http://mvexel.github.io/
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[James]

They should be corrected to the proper format :)

On Oct 27, 2016 6:06 PM, "Martijn van Exel"  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that
> there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
> that.
>
> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format -
> it has a Canada example!
>
> Martijn van Exel
> http://mvexel.github.io/
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

[Talk-ca] Slack

[Martijn van Exel]

Hi all, me again. Perhaps you know that OSM US started a Slack community a
while ago. This has attracted a lot of folks and turned out to be a great
place to chat with fellow mappers / organizers.

If you don't know Slack, it's basically IRC with a friendlier face.
Unfortunately it's not open source, but we chose this pragmatically: the
OSM US board already used Slack and a fair number of OSM community members
already used it for work as well.

This is not for the US alone. Now there's also a Canada channel on there.
If you want to join, go to https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ to
self-invite yourself.

Martijn van Exel
http://mvexel.github.io/
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

[Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

[Martijn van Exel]

Hi all,

My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted that
there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual
hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered
deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is
used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on
that.

We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without
consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can
we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together?
It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format -
it has a Canada example!

Martijn van Exel
http://mvexel.github.io/
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca