I didn't even go look at the edit. I've seen so many fake parks lately I
just automatically assumed the worst. My apologies to Denis001 for
assuming it was related to Pokemon.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM, James wrote:
> seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist
seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it was
just a mistake.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Clifford Snow
wrote:
> It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
> recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely
It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message
with help in how to edit. I provide new users with a link to this blog on
editing for Pokemon,
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
Salut Pierre, J'ai vu le lac sur un node de Canvec que je peux appliquer
aux outline:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570780237#map=17/48.63602/-70.54527=D
C'est ce qui ma fait penser qu'il l'a appliqué à la forêt et non le lac
2017-02-22 15:39 GMT-05:00 Pierre Béland :
>
Bonjour James
Le nom de lac devrait etre appliqué au lac et nom a ce multipolygone décrivant
les forets. Et je ne crois pas qu'il y aie un parc a cet endroit. Le Parc des
monts Valin est un peu plus loin.
Pour référence sur les noms de lacs, voir la toponymie du
I've noticed something going on in the map:
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1944638
Denis001 has added leisure=park to a Canvec forest and a Lake's name. I'm
pretty sure that he ment to add it to the lake itself and not the forest
relation. Just wondering what you think?
6 matches
Mail list logo