Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

I thought the whole idea of importing was to just automate loading data. Then it can be cleaned up on the map. If you are suggesting manual intervention by the importer by checking against satellite and other images aren't you defeating the purpose? Cheerio John Looks good, much better than

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

Hi On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:39 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: I thought the whole idea of importing was to just automate loading data. Then it can be cleaned up on the map. If you are suggesting manual intervention by the importer by checking against satellite and other images

[Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

I think I may have missed the goal here? Are we evaluating the OSM files and trying to make the source better or just requesting OSM files and putting them in? I'm ready to go if we're just putting them in. ;-) ___ Talk-ca mailing list

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

, Daniel -Original Message- From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of G. Michael Carter Sent: 3 juin 2010 08:48 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec. I think I may have missed the goal here? Are we evaluating

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM CanVec.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bégin, Daniel daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote: Hi Mike, You did not miss anything, you are giving comments on a sample - as expected! - About missing names, Canvec features are not named. However you can find some toponyms. - About missing tags on