Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-10-02 Thread Open-Ouvert
this will be live and available. I hope this helps, Have a nice day, Sabrina Open Government Team From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com] Sent: September 28, 2017 6:59 AM To: Stewart C. Russell Cc: talk-ca; Open-Ouvert; Aitken, Kent Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project Looks like we

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-29 Thread Matthew Darwin
Is there anyone on point to drive this activity? On 2017-09-28 06:58 AM, john whelan wrote: Looks like we need to talk nicely to Open-Ouvert. Thanks John On 27 September 2017 at 21:54, Stewart C. Russell > wrote: On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-28 Thread john whelan
Looks like we need to talk nicely to Open-Ouvert. Thanks John On 27 September 2017 at 21:54, Stewart C. Russell wrote: > On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john whelan wrote: > > No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard > > license in the TB kit > > Is this

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john whelan wrote: > No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard > license in the TB kit Is this initiative published anywhere, John? I virtually attended the conference it was supposed to be announced at, and all there is is Jean-Noé's

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread James
municipalities will follow what the federal is doing. ideally everything would be public domain, but that would be a utopian world. forget them switching to ODbL, most people have no idea about it and is very restrictive when you want to change licenses in the future. On Sep 27, 2017 7:01 PM,

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread john whelan
No we need to persuade the municipalities to move to the new standard license in the TB kit and I think Stats will have better success that we will in the first instance also Open-Ouvert could probably let us know which municipalities have expressed an interest in the new license. Cheerio John

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread Alan Richards
It's still a different license for each city, province, or organisation, and the current opinion is that each different license needs to go through the same multi-month review to be approved for OSM. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, john whelan wrote: > T.B. have what

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread john whelan
T.B. have what they call a Municipal Open Data kit which basically has the same license as the city of Ottawa uses plus how to use it. Cheerio John On 27 September 2017 at 18:40, Stewart Russell wrote: > But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And >

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread James
Stewart i meant a license based on v2. As toronto is based on v1 On Sep 27, 2017 6:40 PM, "Stewart Russell" wrote: > But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And > anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month > review. > >

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread Stewart Russell
But they can't use OGL-CA v2 cos municipalities aren't federal. And anything but the actual few already approved licences need a multi-month review. Stewart On Sep 27, 2017 18:28, "James" wrote: > other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2 >

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread john whelan
>How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. I think we need a contact at Stats and since Bjenk has left I'm not sure who is doing what. Alessandro is more management overview than a working contact

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread James
other then have them change their license from say ogl-ca v1 to ogl-cav2 theres not much we can do from a legal stand point. ogl-ca v1 puts too many restrictions On Sep 27, 2017 6:21 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote: > How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-27 Thread Matthew Darwin
How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-17 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: > They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to think > about the project. That sounds good. Despite some prodding, the Licence Working Group (LWG) hasn't got back to me with any updates on how they want to handle the Toronto or

[Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

2017-09-17 Thread john whelan
They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to think about the project. In Ottawa the building outlines were imported but the tags were mapped conventionally. I understand that a lot more POIs have been added manually to enrich the map and we have a number of people who have