Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 15 Sep 2009, at 22:48, Thomas Wood wrote: > > ref/local_ref has been argued here in the past, I can't remember the > reason for settling on the latter, I personally prefer the former. ref should be a national reference whilst local_ref is a reference on a more local basis, in this case usual

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/9/15 Robert Naylor : > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:36:50 +0100, Thomas Wood > wrote: > >> Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred >> by not being able to get online. >> >> Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit), >> Torbay and Thurrock. >> >

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Robert Naylor
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:36:50 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred > by not being able to get online. > > Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit), > Torbay and Thurrock. > Thanks for importing West Yorkshire

Re: [Talk-GB] What's in a name

2009-09-15 Thread Peter J Stoner
In message on 15 Sep 2009, Chris Hill wrote: > I live near Hull, its proper name of course is Kingston upon Hull. It > has the long name on the map, but everyone knows it as Hull. I think it > would be better to use the shorter name and adding the long name as > alt_name. Any comments? This

[Talk-GB] What's in a name

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Hill
I live near Hull, its proper name of course is Kingston upon Hull. It has the long name on the map, but everyone knows it as Hull. I think it would be better to use the shorter name and adding the long name as alt_name. Any comments? Cheers, Chris ___

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Miller
On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:36, Thomas Wood wrote: > Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred > by not being able to get online. > > Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit), > Torbay and Thurrock. > > W.Yorks caused me a lot of problems: > 1) napta

Re: [Talk-GB] Request to revert changeset

2009-09-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Tom Chance wrote: > Is it possible to revert all the changes to relations in changeset 2458838? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2458838 Done. For the record: 1. wget -O foo 'http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/2458838/download' 2. grep relation foo |grep id|cut

[Talk-GB] Request to revert changeset

2009-09-15 Thread Tom Chance
Hi there, Is it possible to revert all the changes to relations in changeset 2458838? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2458838 I wanted to add addr:city=London to every housenumber nodein my area, having missed these off previously. I used OSMXAPI to download the data by filtering

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123

2009-09-15 Thread David Earl
On 15/09/2009 00:59, Lennard wrote: > David Earl wrote: >> Unfortunately, I can't use the revert script to rever this. Though the >> edits are all his, the same way appears twice in the same changeset >> and this seems to upset Frederick's script. I don't know whether it is >> a bug or not. > >

Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Childs
2009/9/15 Peter Miller : > > On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:27, Brian Prangle wrote: > > Hi everyone > > Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as to > whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: > indication of a shelter is a representation of what's prese

Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/9/15 Christoph Boehme : > Peter Miller wrote: >> >> On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:27, Brian Prangle wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as >>> to whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: >>> indication of a shel

Re: [Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer

2009-09-15 Thread Christoph Boehme
Peter Miller wrote: > > On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:27, Brian Prangle wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as >> to whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: >> indication of a shelter is a representation of what's p

[Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Miller
On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:27, Brian Prangle wrote: Hi everyone Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as to whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: indication of a shelter is a representation of what's present on the ground and it's a pr

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Wood
Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred by not being able to get online. Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit), Torbay and Thurrock. W.Yorks caused me a lot of problems: 1) naptan:Notes was populated, often with strings greater than 255 ch

[Talk-GB] NOVAM viewer

2009-09-15 Thread Brian Prangle
Hi everyone Shelter = yes/no I think is essential to leave in as a requirement as to whether a bus stop is completley surveyed or not. For two reasons: indication of a shelter is a representation of what's present on the ground and it's a pretty siginificant presence ( after all we tag and map sma