just wondering: are any of the highway=footpath tags still in OSM
database? I always used to use those for "legal rights-of-way
footpaths with a footpath sign" until it became OSM-standard that
highway=footway should be used for all paths regardless of legal
status.
__
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:33:31 +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
[snip]
> At a future meeting I would love to be able to recommend that they
> print an OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, MapOSMatic, which is the only
> service that I am aware of that allows one to create big town maps
> only works with
>It's a bit more sophisticated than that; see the URL for what I consider
a right of way. Note that I tried a >version with highway=footway,foot=yes
added in, and got the same sort of pattern.
>Nick
In fact, it's possible to add highway=footway, foot=yes to the definition
of a right of way by
Hello Andy,
>Couple of comments on that. Quite a lot of PROW within the urban sprawl.
>These being ways that have had to be adjusted and realigned when housing
>development extended, but at least were maintained as a route.
True, though perhaps these aren't so important to show as most people
in
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> I put a few roads in last night and when I checked them this morning
> they were missing from the level 14,15,16 in Maplink. I then added a
> turning circle I had missed. About 1/2 hour ago they were missing from
> levels 14-18.
>
> They are
It is probably due to a fresh planet import.
http://matt.sandbox.cloudmade.com is currently up to date.
Shaun
On 23 Oct 2009, at 15:21, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> I put a few roads in last night and when I checked them this morning
> they were missing from the level 14,15,16 in Maplink. I then added
I put a few roads in last night and when I checked them this morning
they were missing from the level 14,15,16 in Maplink. I then added a
turning circle I had missed. About 1/2 hour ago they were missing from
levels 14-18.
They are all there in Osmarender.
location is
http://www.openstreetmap.or
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>Sent: 23 October 2009 10:43 AM
>To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [Talk-GB] Proper Rights of Way coverage map
>
>Hello everyone,
>
>Following on from the unintentional rights-of-way coverage map generated
>by zooming out from the OSM/First Edition mashup that I mentione
2009/10/23 Peter Miller
>
> I was at a meeting with our county council yesterday evening to
> discuss 'strategic cycle routes' in my town for inclusion in the
> official cycling strategy which will be applicable for the next
> decade. It was a very good and useful meeting, only one problem
> thou
Hello everyone,
Following on from the unintentional rights-of-way coverage map generated
by zooming out from the OSM/First Edition mashup that I mentioned the
other day, I've now done a script to generate a real one.
It's available at
http://www.free-map.org.uk/freemap/stats/statsmap.php
That
Peter Miller wrote:
> At a future meeting I would love to be able to recommend that they
> print an OpenStreetMap.
I'm working on a web service that will create a PDF map on demand,
given a MapCSS stylesheet (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapCSS)
and a bounding box. It's only in its ver
2009/10/23 Peter Miller
>
> Ok, so after looking a bit more carefully and reading their blog[1] it
> says that they are working on the performance issues associated with
> running a global service.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Peter
>
> [1] http://news.maposmatic.org/
>
>
>
>
>
2009/10/23 Peter Miller
>
> I was at a meeting with our county council yesterday evening to
> discuss 'strategic cycle routes' in my town for inclusion in the
> official cycling strategy which will be applicable for the next
> decade. It was a very good and useful meeting, only one problem
> thou
Ok, so after looking a bit more carefully and reading their blog[1] it
says that they are working on the performance issues associated with
running a global service.
Regards,
Peter
[1] http://news.maposmatic.org/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Ta
I was at a meeting with our county council yesterday evening to
discuss 'strategic cycle routes' in my town for inclusion in the
official cycling strategy which will be applicable for the next
decade. It was a very good and useful meeting, only one problem
though, the base map they were us
15 matches
Mail list logo
