I'm sorry if I quoted from the contributor terms out of context, it was not
my intention. You are right that detailed discussion of this stuff belongs
on legal-talk. But, to be clear, are you saying that there is nothing in the
current contributor terms that precludes large-scale copying from the
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
> So the question is then whether the OS has given 'explicit permission' to
> 'grant to OSMF a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual,
> irrevocable
> licence to do any act that is restricted by copyright over anything within the
> Conten
2 matches
Mail list logo
