Hi Matt,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 04:06:05PM +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
> I've made a few updates to the postcode finder [1]. There's a mixture
> of fixes suggested by you people and some other features I'd been
> planning on implementing anyway.
>
> The new things:
> - Postal address-like info o
On 21 March 2011 12:05, Andy Allan wrote:
[...]
> A cautionary tale about inferring too much from postcodes - the
> positions given are the position of where the mail should be delivered
> to, and sometimes doesn't correspond to where you would expect given
> the name and the rest of address.
>
On 21/03/2011 17:04, Matt Williams wrote:
On 21 March 2011 17:53, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Ed Loach wrote:
Steve wrote:
How do you tag these? I confess I don't really know what they are.
I'd be tempted to make up a tag, or maybe use designation= as I
think often the centre
Matt:
> Is this not a suitable use of the operator= tag? Or is a SureStart
> centre so different that it deserves more differentiation?
>
> In whichever case, I think that 'SureStart' should be fine.
The nursery where my son is (which I'm basing most of my knowledge of Surestart
Centre's on) is
On 21 March 2011 18:16, Ed Loach wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>> Indeed. I've been tagging these as amenity=kindergarten
>
> My son's nursery is also tagged as a kindergarten (how did that tag
> value sneak in?) but I haven't tagged that it is also a designated
> SureStart centre, which was Steve's origin
Matt wrote:
> Indeed. I've been tagging these as amenity=kindergarten
My son's nursery is also tagged as a kindergarten (how did that tag
value sneak in?) but I haven't tagged that it is also a designated
SureStart centre, which was Steve's original question that I tried
to answer. I am still te
On 21 March 2011 17:53, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Ed Loach wrote:
>> Steve wrote:
>>
>> > How do you tag these? I confess I don't really know what they are.
>>
>> I'd be tempted to make up a tag, or maybe use designation= as I
>> think often the centres are primarily something e
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Ed Loach wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>
> > How do you tag these? I confess I don't really know what they are.
>
> I'd be tempted to make up a tag, or maybe use designation= as I
> think often the centres are primarily something else.
>
> http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Parents/Presch
Steve wrote:
> How do you tag these? I confess I don't really know what they are.
I'd be tempted to make up a tag, or maybe use designation= as I
think often the centres are primarily something else.
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Parents/Preschooldevelopmentandlearning/
NurseriesPlaygroupsReceptio
How do you tag these? I confess I don't really know what they are.
--
Steve
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 11/03/2011 10:19, Steve Chilton wrote:
I have been asked by editor of the Cartographic Journal to write a short piece
on the effect of the release of OS OpenData on the OpenStreetMap project, and I
am just trying to gather my thoughts, and make sure I cover all bases.
I was present at Blacka
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 20/03/11 22:20, Matt Williams wrote:
>
>> Ahh, looking at the map [2] it seems that they are all located at the
>> Royal Mail distribution office. My question still stands though: are
>> these just surplus postcodes or some error? There are
Matt Williams writes:
>>Possible bug: I just tried searching for my own address (42c Mulberry Road)
>>and it returned no results,
>What I _plan_ to add it that if you search for '42c Mulberry Road'
>then it will indeed return a result as you'd expect but there's no way
>to do anything useful if
Steve Doerr writes:
>>'Postcode W9 is badly formed' - many streets are tagged with just the first
>>part of the postcode (the outbound code).
>>I do however want to flag
>>these as, while they are certainly useful, they are not 'true
>>postcodes'.
>
>I agree with the last point: 'postcode' is a
14 matches
Mail list logo
