On 03/04/11 14:19, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
wrote:
a) Do not import any NaPTAN data in areas where imports have already taken
place. Experience shows that detailed survey& correction of NaPTAN data is
not to be undertaken lightly. IIRC
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
wrote:
>
> a) Do not import any NaPTAN data in areas where imports have already taken
> place. Experience shows that detailed survey & correction of NaPTAN data is
> not to be undertaken lightly. IIRC about 10% is wrong. The best data are
The "audit" might also identify area champions.
I feel that I have a pretty good eye on what is happening in my Borough
(Enfield) and try to be actively maintaining the data for it (possibly less
well in southern edge of Borough).
Would it help to see what parts of London have similar active comm
On 3 April 2011 10:28, Andy Allan wrote:
> I've found this in swathes of south London - pairs of naptan and
> non-naptan bus stops along major roads, suggesting that it's been
> years of things not being fixed up before I noticed. I was quite
> surprised to see that given that London is one of ou
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
wrote:
> c) The best approach would be to host current NaPTAN data in a location
> where OSM data can be compared & then mappers could choose to import it.
> Having an application which did this would be way more useful than
> shoehorning
5 matches
Mail list logo