On 17 June 2011 18:04, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Andy Allan also provided a good argued answer to a similar question
to yours on http://help.openstreetmap.org [2] in case you haven't
seen it.
I hadn't seen it, so thanks. But there's also a response below it
explaining why Ed's reasoning
On 17/06/2011 14:50, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
On 16 June 2011 17:50, Michael Collinsonm...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
Here is as much information as I can give. It is not conclusive so I would
summarise by saying that I *personally* (great emphasis!) have some
contributions derived from OS
Michael Collinson mike@... writes:
In other words, for the LWG, if data is compatible with *current*
license terms, then there is no problem contributing it and accepting
the contributor terms.
This is a nice explanation. Could it be added as a clarifying paragraph to
the contributor terms
3 matches
Mail list logo
