On 17 June 2011 18:04, Ed Loach <e...@loach.me.uk> wrote: > Andy Allan also provided a good argued answer to a similar question > to yours on http://help.openstreetmap.org [2] in case you haven't > seen it.
I hadn't seen it, so thanks. But there's also a response below it explaining why Ed's reasoning is incorrect. To support the view that clause 2 acts independently of clause 1 (ie you must comply with both of them) Francis Davey (who is a lawyer) has offered his opinion that you can't even add CC-By data to OSM and comply with the CTs [3]. This certainly wouldn't be the case if you *only* had to follow clause 1. We're still waiting to hear LWG's view on this, and how they think the CTs are supposed to operate... Robert. [2] http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5792/can-i-accept-the-new-contributor-terms-if-ive-contributed-data-from-ordnance-survey-opendata [3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-April/005920.html -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
