Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > In the mean time, could I suggest that other mappers > don't start replacing my contributions just yet. Speaking personally: sure. I'm happy to leave your stuff alone for a week. I think replacing Etienne's contributions in the areas I'm interested in will keep me

[Talk-GB] Trail markers

2011-07-20 Thread SomeoneElse
A couple of days ago I spotted a couple of marked trails that I'd not seen before. Before I spend a fruitless half-hour trying to google for a picture (unfortunately neither has a description on the trail marker) could anyone point me in the direction of a gallery of such things? I'm sure tha

Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread Steve Coast
On 7/20/2011 11:29 AM, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: On 20 July 2011 17:25, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: There's a draft statement in the LWG minutes a few weeks ago [2]. I wonder if LWG got round to approving this at their most recent meeting... They have now done

Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread Andy Street
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:25 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > > There's a draft statement in the LWG minutes a few > > weeks ago [2]. I wonder if LWG got round to approving this > > at their most recent meeting... > > They have now done so! Looks interesting, I'

Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM)
On 20 July 2011 17:25, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: >> There's a draft statement in the LWG minutes a few >> weeks ago [2]. I wonder if LWG got round to approving this >> at their most recent meeting... > > They have now done so! Yes, I've seen -- and that's great. On

Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread 80n
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > > There's a draft statement in the LWG minutes a few > > weeks ago [2]. I wonder if LWG got round to approving this > > at their most recent meeting... > > They have now done so! > > "In response to communi

Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK

2011-07-20 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > There's a draft statement in the LWG minutes a few > weeks ago [2]. I wonder if LWG got round to approving this > at their most recent meeting... They have now done so! "In response to community requests, the LWG formally clarifies as follows: "The intent of the