In message CAK5An89pm9i_BOnCkF39wz0+THwdp6+njGN83MaEv3DXioWrgw@mail.g
mail.com
Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
I came across a stop that has been added since the import, so I found
the stop data in the NaPTAN release on data.gov.uk, parsed it with
naptan2osm and
There would be no objection from the Traveline point of view of using
the NaPTAN data released on data.gov.uk
Peter thanks for the reply but my question was more about getting out
of step with the original NaPTAN import process. At various places in
the OSM documentation of the process there
Not sure if anyone else is seeing this, but haven't seen it mentioned anywhere.
As of the last few days, I am getting OS 1:50k background mapping when
zoomed in to areas with no detailed coverage in the Bing aerial
imagery. Where there is detailed Bing imagery, that shows instead.
I presume this
On 19/09/11 19:09, Donald Noble wrote:
I am getting OS 1:50k background mapping when zoomed in to areas
with no detailed coverage in the Bing aerial imagery.
[snip]
An example is at Coulter, North Lanarkshire -
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=55.58837lon=-3.54917zoom=15
Confirmed.
Hi!
After this initial announcement, I haven't heard much more. Is this
still going through? Who's attending? Is there a cake diagram yet?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Surrey_Hills_Mapping_Party
cheers,
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a
5 matches
Mail list logo