Andy Allan writes:
>>1.) Assume you need to replace a node which is in the intersection of
>>several ways.
>Using Potlatch 2, select the junction node and press "O". This deletes
>the node and attaches a new node to the cursor - you need to click to
>position it.
If you reposition the new node
You could try using the OSM History Browser to list the change sets and
allow you to compare selected changes.
http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/
I got this from the Route Relations 'h' link on the
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_Long_Distance_
Paths page. It wil
Sorry to ask such a naive sounding question in this thread where there
are clearly many involved who know *a lot" about the subject, but I am
left rather unsure about what we mean when we say that we need to do
some "re-mapping" of nodes and ways which are in danger of removal when
only contrib
On 15 January 2012 10:27, David Dixon wrote:
>
> I'm not the user who recently finished off the Weardale Way (and I don't
> know whether that was done from survey) but surveying the Way has been one
> of my projects. The route between Frosterley and Wolsingham used to be a
> low level route runn
>
>
> There's a great OSM Deep History services at http://osm.mapki.com/history/
>
> http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=86561
>
> Thanks Andy - I had forgotten about that.
Graham.
--
Graham Jones
Hartlepool, UK.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
Should probably be asking on the main list, but I am only looking at UK data
here.
Having cleared many of the licence problems locally, just a few odd ones which
need resurveying if they go, I'm now looking to add another layer of detail, but
there is no consistency in the way this is being do
On 14 January 2012 15:35, Eike Ritter wrote:
> I'm trying to do some remapping, and would be grateful for some help in
> situations I've encountered.
>
> 1.) Assume you need to replace a node which is in the intersection of
> several ways. If I simply delete the node and re-create it, I'd have to
On 13 January 2012 16:36, Tom Chance wrote:
> I'd rather not find big chunks of south east London and little segments of
> major roads disappear overnight if I can help it.
I've started work in SW London (Putney / Wimbledon / Streatham) areas,
concentrating on the major roads. Much of this is si
On 14 January 2012 20:34, Dave F. wrote:
> Q's
>
> Does anyone have a template letter along the lines of 'please can you sign
> the agreement as it would mean a lot of hard work replacing your data' to
> send to those that are undecided or, more likely, unaware of the change? I'm
> crap at being
On 15 January 2012 09:28, Graham Jones wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to find the history of the relation covering the Weardale Way (
> 86561 ). I can view the relation itself ok at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561, but when I try to view
> the history of it with
> http://www.ope
Hi Graham,
On 15/01/2012 09:28, Graham Jones wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to find the history of the relation covering the Weardale
Way ( 86561 ). I can view the relation itself ok at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561, but when I try to
view the history of it with
http://www.openstr
Hi,
I am trying to find the history of the relation covering the Weardale Way (
86561 ). I can view the relation itself ok at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561, but when I try to view
the history of it with
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561/history, I always get
12 matches
Mail list logo
