On 2 March 2012 14:35, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a good
time to look at the current state of the UK.
We're almost certainly not going to be able to able to get the UK
completely clean by the switch-over, and
I agree that we want to try and have a complete main road network network.
Whilst longish stretches of road are easy to spot there are a lot of
other small sections (eg. bridges) which are harder to see on cleanmap
(unless the rest of the area is clean).
We also have the issue of nodes going
I can't say I'm convinced about the value of adding FIXMEs to 7000+ postboxes
in the UK in changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10834378
1. Collection Times when missing can be cross referenced with the open data
request with the Royal Mail when the postbox has a
On 3 March 2012 16:45, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
I can't say I'm convinced about the value of adding FIXMEs to 7000+ postboxes
in the UK in changeset:
...
As such I'm thinking the changeset should probably be reverted/removed.
Wholeheartedly agree. Automated QA shouldn't
Hi,
On 03/03/2012 05:45 PM, Robert Norris wrote:
As such I'm thinking the changeset should probably be reverted/removed.
Yes, this kind of automated edit is not acceptable. The user seems to
lean towards that kind of edit, having seemingly auto-added operator
tags to French phone boxes
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
I wonder if another prioritisation approach might be useful
too -- prioritising certain high-value types of objects,
where-ever they might be.
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea. Obviously, everyone has their own
definition of high value (I'm quite anxious to
6 matches
Mail list logo
