Congratulations and many thanks to all those who worked so hard to effect
the licence changeover - including all those who contributed to the mad
rush to recover as much of the map as possible before the cutoff.
One small point for the communications team- the link from the home page to
open
Not quite yet Brian, the database is still CC-BY-SA until it's been cleaned
of non-compliant data. That will take some time yet. The downtime was just
to move the whole database to the new server. You can still remap as you
were before the 1st April if you so desire though as the redaction process
Hi all,
Randomly found myself checking the status of the 'Southwest Coast Path'
relation yesterday. Checked it using a few of the links found on the
Wiki United
Kingdom Long Distance
Jason Cunningham wrote:
Last nights check showed almost the entire route has gone!
:(
Disturbingly I've been mapping around
Brixham for the last six months and I'm therefore concerned I may
have done the dirty deed.
No, you didn't.
It appears to have been deleted by user Sailor Steve
Jason Cunningham wrote:
I'm therefore concerned I may have done the dirty deed.
It wasn't you!
wget --timeout=120 http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/69318
shows that the current version is 1751
Looking at the sizes in bytes of previous versions (by doing e.g. wget
--timeout=120
Someoneelse wrote:
* For those keeping scores, I'm aware of 6 OMG a relation has
disappeareds since late last year. I believe that it's now 3-all
(JOSM v Potlatch). This one was JOSM/1.5 (4878 en_GB).
A few weeks ago I committed a change to beef up the delete relation
confirmation dialogue
Right, (following a discussion on IRC) the SW coast path should be back
to as it was in rev 1746 now, apart from ways 30720938, 65128178,
2604800, 30337452, 22976293, 4980897, and 98346377 which were deleted.
Locals familiar with the route might want to check what to check the gaps.
Also,
thanks for the fix. was logged into the IRC channel so was aware you were
fixing it.
Various available links given for checking or viewing the relation are not
working (at the moment). Is this a temporary problem, or is it linked to
the size of the relation? Is this a type of relation that should
8 matches
Mail list logo