Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

Roads either side are unclassified/residential, so I've made it unclassified & added turn restrictions Richard On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > I believe it is wide enough for two cars, and is used to access Glynde > IIRC. > Stephen > > On 26 June 2012 11:11, Richard

Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

I believe it is wide enough for two cars, and is used to access Glynde IIRC. Stephen On 26 June 2012 11:11, Richard Mann wrote: > Sounds like it needs a turning restriction, not to be a tertiary_link. Do > you have a view on whether it should be a tertiary (ie clearly wide enough > for two-way tr

Re: [Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

I know that area. That road is a typical minor country road. The A27 is divided at that point by a central barrier. It can only be entered from Lewes, and exited to Beddingham. Stephen On 26 June 2012 10:00, Richard Mann wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014 > > My guess is

[Talk-GB] Not my patch, but why's this a tertiary_link

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/114413014 My guess is that it should be a highway=unclassified, but maybe someone in Brighton/Lewes can provide some local knowledge? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.or

Re: [Talk-GB] Use of PRoW Definitive Statements from Hertfordshire, Oxfordshire, Worcestershire

On 22 June 2012 07:06, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> Does anyone know who is able to edit the text on [5]?) >> [5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright > > You can send a pull request via github with > https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#sending-the-patches . > Failing that I'd