Hi folks,
If anyone has a iphone and/or an ipad and wants to try this new OSM
app out then I would be very interested in feedback. Perhaps a few
sentences and we can upload it to the mappa mercia blog too.
All the best,
Rob
-- Forwarded message --
I'd like to highly recommend a brand-new,
Hi Barry,
On 24 Jan 2013 11:38, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Please can you confirm that the routes are now better...
The Devon kml data looks spot on now.
thanks,
Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
All this discussion of rights of way reminds me: is there a consensus
about how (and whether) to map rights-of-way which are either impassable
or invisible?
I've encountered examples of both round here, and have so far chosen not
to map them at all, on the grounds that we're trying to map the
On 24 Jan 2013, at 14:34, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is there
somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk. (at
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is
there somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk. (at least for southern and northern England and
Wales)
On 25 Jan 2013, at 10:42, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the
designation tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon /
ever? Or is there somewhere that already exists that renders
designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk.
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 10:09 +, John Aldridge wrote:
All this discussion of rights of way reminds me: is there a consensus
about how (and whether) to map rights-of-way which are either impassable
or invisible?
I've encountered examples of both round here, and have so far chosen not
to
Report the problem to your local authority who have a legal obligation to sort
it out with the landowner. My local councils do sort it out, occasionally they
need a reminder, but it is worth the effort.
I only add a PRoW if I have surveyed it on the ground, so if it is impassable I
would not
On 25/01/2013 10:09, John Aldridge wrote:
I've encountered examples of both round here, and have so far chosen
not to map them at all, on the grounds that we're trying to map the
actual state of the ground, not some legal fiction.
We should be mapping to both conditions, If, on the ground,
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:58 +, Dave F. wrote:
Blockages of ways are often just temporary.
I disagree with Andy Street's comment:
If you can't traverse a right of way then it shouldn't have a highway
tag.
Okay perhaps I could have been clearer but I wasn't suggesting omitting
the highway
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 18:52 +, Andy Street wrote:
when someone builds a house over a public right of way
Does that happen often? Is there not some requirement to then knock the
house down again if it's blocking a right of way?
hen
___
Talk-GB
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:01 +, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 18:52 +, Andy Street wrote:
when someone builds a house over a public right of way
Does that happen often? Is there not some requirement to then knock the
house down again if it's blocking a right of way?
I think normally the footpath will be legally redirected around the new
building before its built, but I have heard of a few cases where the footpath
never got moved (I think I came across one because there was no sign of a path
where the OS map showed there was one, but OS maps can be quite
On 25/01/2013 18:52, Andy Street wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:58 +, Dave F. wrote:
Blockages of ways are often just temporary.
I disagree with Andy Street's comment:
If you can't traverse a right of way then it shouldn't have a highway
tag.
Okay perhaps I could have been clearer but I
14 matches
Mail list logo
